Conflicts of Interest

When people talk about conflicts of interest, theybe in no rush to sell, yet her agent devotes
usually assume that professionals consciously considerconsiderable energy to persuading her that it is best
these opposing forces (what's good for them versusto make a sale before the market cools down. What
their professional obligations). Take, for example, thecan be done about this problem?
old lawyer joke, "It's not whether you win or lose, it'sDue to the failure of agents to act professionally in
how long you play the game," which implies thatmany domains, including auditing, investment banking,
attorneys are primarily motivated to maximize theirand real estate, both federal and state governments
billable hours. However, when lawyers are paid by thehave stepped in to remedy the situation. The most
hour, they may truly come to believe that theirpopular solution has been to implement rules
clients are best served by a thorough, time-intensivemandating disclosure. The reasoning is that, if
process, whereas lawyers whose clients pay them aconsumers understand that their advisers and agents
percentage of a settlement may be more likely tohave a conflict of interest, they can take the steps
believe that their clients are best served by a quicknecessary to protect themselves. Are such remedies
agreement. These beliefs are not conscious oreffective? Perhaps not. Consider that, in most states,
deliberately unethical, but they are biased byreal-estate agents for buyers and sellers are required
circumstance. Or as Upton Sinclair once stated, "It isto have their customers sign a disclosure statement
difficult to get a man to understand something whenclarifying that the agent will earn a percentage of any
his salary depends upon his not understanding it."sales transaction. Most people sign the disclosure
In buyer-seller negotiations, it is common for theform and never again consider the actual conflict of
seller to believe that she is selling a higher-qualityinterest between buyer and agent. Instead, they
product than the buyer thinks he is buying. In fact,truly believe that their agent is providing objective
buyers often believe that the goods offered byadvice.
different sellers are indistinguishable from each other,Furthermore, research suggests that disclosure could
while the sellers view their own products asactually increase the problems that result from
significantly better than those of other providers.conflicts of interest. A study conducted by decision
Thus, when a salesperson says, "Sure, I will benefit ifresearchers Daylian Cain, Don Moore, and George
you buy our product, but I wouldn't try to sell it toLoewenstein, participants playing the role of "adviser"
you if I didn't believe it was the best product for youwere (in some cases) required to tell a participant
and your company," she may well believe thisplaying the role of "client" that he had a vested stake
statement. Yet substantial research tells us that thein having the client believe that a commodity had a
seller's conflict of interest (being honest vs. makinghigh value. As it turns out, this disclosure led
the sale) can lead her to unconsciously view the"advisers" to feel more comfortable exaggerating
world through a biased lens and to believe that hertheir estimates; after all, "I already told them I was
product is the very best option for you -- evenbiased."At the same time, the "clients" often believed
when that is not the case. When a seller claims thatthat their advisers were more trustworthy if they
his products are the best on the market, and ahad disclosed their conflict of interest. In other
prospective buyer believes that the products arewords, advisers would have been more honest, and
indistinguishable from those of the competition, theclients would have been more cautious, if there had
buyer is likely to make sinister attributions about thebeen no disclosure!
seller's ethics. When the discussion is over, the buyerIf disclosure will not help resolve this ethical dilemma,
assumes that the seller's statements were indicativewhat are we to do? First, to the extent possible, try
of unethical behavior when, in fact, the seller wasto solicit advice and expertise from people who do
falling prey to the psychological trap that Sinclairnot have a stake in the outcome and who do not
predicted.profit from manipulating your behavior or decisions.
The Problem of AgentsWhen this is not possible, try to collect additional
Conflicts of interest often become most problematicinformation from outside sources that can serve as a
when agents are involved -- whether the agents arereality check on the advice you have been given. For
investment bankers, lawyers, literary agents,example, if the real-estate agent tells you that a
real-estate agents, or some other type of third partyparticular property or region is worth investing in,
with a stake in the negotiation's outcome. Considersolicit an outsider's opinion by asking a different
what happens when a real-estate agent advises you,real-estate agent (a friend, an acquaintance, or a
the buyer, to raise your bid on a house even thoughstranger whom you have not hired) whether this
your current bid is consistent with a rationaladvice seems sound. Finally, be willing to ask your
assessment of the property's value. Is the agentagent to justify her analysis. Instead of taking her
thinking only of her own commission? We would"expert opinion" at face value, try to discover what
argue that she is probably not intentionally corrupt,objective criteria or procedure she employed before
but simply human, and therefore implicitly motivatedmaking her claims. She may trust her "intuition," but
to see the world in a way that maximizes her ownthere is no reason that you should.
returns from the deal. The agent can quickly think ofA final note: most of us view conflicts of interest as
past situations in which a buyer preferred to overpaya genuine societal problem that must be remedied.
rather than risk losing a house, or bitterly regrettedWe understand that conflicts of interest can contort
not heeding the agent's advice to overpay. On thepeople's judgments. Yet we have trouble believing
other hand, it will be much harder for her to recallthat they affect our own judgments. The truth is
times when this was the wrong advice, even thoughthat none of us is immune. There is no good reason
this happened more frequently.to believe that you will behave any differently from
When you are planning to buy or sell a house, yourthe agent, the auditor, the buyer, or the seller when
agent will undoubtedly tell you that she is working inyou have conflicting motivations and interests. To
your best interest. But when we look at the situationavoid such unintended unethical behaviors, the first
objectively, it becomes clear that the agent is a thirdstep is to recognize your own fallibility.
party in the transaction, one whose interests do notCopyright © 2007 Deepak Malhorta and Max H.
perfectly match those of her principal (the buyer orBazerman
seller). The buyer who wishes to pay as little asThe above is an excerpt from the book Negotiation
possible and who is in no hurry to buy may have toGenius by Deepak Malhorta and Max H. Bazerman
deal with a well-intentioned agent who is paid morePublished by Bantam Dell; September 2007;$26.00US
when the selling price is high and who would love to$34.00CAN; 978-0-553-80488-1 Copyright ©
close the deal as soon possible. Similarly, a seller may2007 Deepak Malhorta and Max H.