Gao Report: Federal And State Regulators Are Spinning Their Tires; Title Industry Report Recommends Coordinated Regulatory Effort

The current regulatory environment enveloping theconcerned that the Department of Insurance's
title insurance industry is clouded by constrainedproposed statistical reporting requirements will force
enforcement resources, minimal oversight of titlethem out of business, as they cannot now provide
agents and a lack of coordination among state anddata from past years that was not required of them
federal regulators, according to the U.S. Governmentat the time.
Accountability Office's (GAO) long-awaited report on"Some of the information the GAO wants to collect
the title insurance industry.drills into personnel and hiring practices and
On April 17, the GAO, the investigative arm ofmicromanages the entire process," said Joe Petrelli,
Congress, released the results of its much ballyhooedfounder of Demotech, a ratings firm based in
probe of the title industry, launched a year ago atColumbus, Ohio. "It's a level of detail I don't think
the request of then-House Financial Servicespeople have. It's a tremendous layer of fixed
Committee Chairman Michael Oxley.overhead that no one anticipated, and it's not like
The report, titled "Title Insurance: Actions Needed toyou can snap your fingers and get that type of
Improve Oversight of the Title Industry and Betterdetail."
Protect Consumers," identified significant barriers toMatters for Congressional consideration
the successful regulation of the title industry, but forAs far as Congress' role in the melee, the GAO
every weak link in the regulatory chain, the GAOrecommended that Congress reevaluate certain
offered a remedy, calling for the active participationaspects of RESPA.
of federal, state and local regulators."Revisiting RESPA to ensure that consumers receive
"Given consumers' weak position in the title insurancethis information as soon as possible when they are
market, regulatory efforts to ensure reasonableconsidering any type of mortgage transaction ... could
prices and deter illegal marketing activities are critical,"be beneficial," the GAO said.
the report stated. "Given the variety of professionalsThe GAO's recommendations to Congress were
involved in a real estate transaction, a lack oftwofold. Congress could provide HUD with increased
coordination among different regulators within states,enforcement authority for Section 8 violations, such
and between HUD and the states, could potentiallyas the ability to levy civil money penalties. Congress
hinder enforcement efforts against compensation forcould also make a detailed homebuyer information
consumer referrals. Because of the involvement ofbooklet available to consumers.
both federal and state regulators, including multipleThese recommendations are in line with what HUD's
regulators at the state level, effective regulatoryRESPA office has likely been discussing since Fall
improvements will be a challenge and will require a2005, when the department retreated into its
coordinated effort among all involved."chambers to mull over RESPA reform. Thus, by all
This effort is one strongly supported by all industryaccounts, the GAO's Congressional recommendations
players, but exactly how and when the GAO'sstand a fair chance of becoming reality.
recommendations will be implemented is a source of"HUD has long sought such authority, and the GAO
some debate.report may be HUD's best chance to get it," said Rich
Frustration exists at federal and state levelsAndreano, partner with the Washington, D.C., law firm
Limited state and federal oversight of the titleWeiner Brodsky Sidman Kider PC.
industry has resulted in proposals for change, theDoubting Thomases
GAO found, but those changes are focused on theBut the apparent consensus between HUD and the
state level, mainly in the affiliated business arena.GAO does not mean these recommendations will see
"Some state regulators expressed frustration withthe light of day, at least in the foreseeable future,
HUD's level of responsiveness to their requests forsaid some skeptical industry leaders.
help with enforcement, and some industry officialsSome industry players are hedging their bets that the
said that RESPA rules regarding ABAs and referralrecommendations will be swept under the carpet as
fees need to be clarified," the GAO said.Congress contemplates changes to predatory lending
However, the more limited regulation and oversightand FHA reform.
of title agents and AfBAs in less active states couldNoted RESPA attorney Phil Schulman of Kirkpatrick &
provide greater opportunity for potentially illegalLockhart Preston Gates Ellis said, "The timing of the
marketing and sales practices, the GAO said. Whilereport works in the industry's favor, given that the
the GAO listed states such as Colorado, California andfocus on Capital Hill and elsewhere is on subprime
Minnesota as leaders in enforcement and oversight,lending and the avalanche of foreclosures, not title
the report concluded that states' enforcement ofinsurance reform."
anti-kickback and referral fee provisions were uneven.National mortgage training expert Christopher Cruise
That would place the onus on HUD, but HUD officialsobserved that "the title insurance industry has
expressed concern over a lack of enforcementdodged a bullet here. Asking the states to step up
authority for RESPA Section 8 violations, the GAOtheir enforcement activities seems reasonable, but,
said.except in a few states with strong insurance
"According to HUD officials, it is difficult to detercommissioners, that simply won't happen. I believe, in
future violations without stronger enforcementthe long run that this report will have minimal effect
authority, such as civil money penalties, because ...and that title insurance rates will change little, if at all."
companies view small settlements as simply a cost ofKen Trepeta, regulatory policy representative for the
doing business," the GAO said.National Association of Realtors (NAR), likewise said,
Viewing these concerns as critical to the health of"The RESPA civil penalties issue is intriguing, but I
the industry, the GAO made a number ofwonder if anyone in Congress really has the stomach
recommendations to improve oversight at eachto revisit RESPA. I know Sen. [Mel] Martinez is
government level as well as to better coordinate theinterested in RESPA, but he has spoken more along
various efforts of those regulators.the lines of disclosure."
Agents: Where's the beef?The writing on the wall
State regulators could most benefit by examining titleAlthough some are skeptical that the report will
agent costs, the GAO found. Officials in several statematter much in this era of increased scrutiny on
insurance departments last year questioned whetherpredatory lending and mortgage issues, others believe
agents are worth their premium splits, and the GAOit is a fallacy to say that the problems of the title
quickly picked up on this debate, finding thatand settlement services industries are that far
regulators do not fully assess title agents' costsremoved from the problems in the mortgage
during rate reviews.industry.
"Few regulators review the costs that title agentsIndeed, Rep. Spencer Bachus, R-Ala., ranking member
incur to determine whether they are in line with theof the House Financial Services Committee, has
prices charged," the report stated. "In fact, in thecommented, "The GAO's findings are significant, and I
majority of states, agents' costs for search andlook forward to reviewing those findings thoroughly."
examination services are not considered part of theSome respected sources have indicated to The Legal
premium and thus, receive no review by regulators.Description that Congress has been waiting for the
Therefore, title agents charge separately for theirresults of the GAO report in order to determine if
search and examination services, yet they receivethere were issues that needed to be addressed
about the same percentage of the premium asbefore putting RESPA and title industry reform on
agents in states where these costs are included inthe front-burner.
the premium."Other industry leaders willing to speak on the record
Title insurers told the GAO that they generally shareagreed that this scenario is not as farfetched as
the same percentage of the premium with theirsome skeptics believe.
agents, around 80 to 90 percent, regardless of"Congress obviously is still reviewing this and will be, I
whether those agents were in states wherepresume, taking that under consideration along with
consumers pay for agents' search and examinationany other appropriate legislation," said Sue Johnson,
services within the premium rate - known asexecutive director of the Real Estate Services
all-inclusive states - or whether they were in statesProviders Council Inc. (RESPRO). "I would be surprised
where agents can charge consumers separately forif Congress did not touch base with HUD to check on
those services - known as risk-rate states.the status of their RESPA rule and consult with them.
However, reliable data to determine whetherA lot of this has to simply play out."
consumers in risk-rate states consistently paid moreAndreano was perhaps most confident in the
than those in all-inclusive states does not exist, theprediction that Congress will put all of the pieces of
GAO said, and thus recommended a "multi-stepthe puzzle together to bolster its ongoing
process that could involve detailed analysis of somehomeownership initiatives.
title agents." While the GAO placed the onus of this"I think it's safe to say that the GAO will not be on
auditing function on state insurance regulators, somethe title industry's Christmas list this year," Andreano
industry experts pointed out that reportingsaid. "While the report focuses on, and is critical of,
requirements currently vary by state, making itthe title industry, all settlement service providers
difficult for some companies to provide the type ofneed to focus on Congressional reaction. Clearly, title
uniform data needed to form constructiveindustry revenues are now under a microscope and
conclusions.the industry needs to be prepared to address
In California, for example, some companies arescrutiny from regulators and lawmakers.