Knowledge Management in Healthcare: Succeeding in Spite of Technology

Technology and healthcare always have had anbox readily accessible? Does the hospital culture
uneasy relationship. On one hand, there is the promiseencourage suggestions and incorporate them into the
of technology and the enhancements it offersorganization's routines? If so, this is a working and
healthcare. These include improved medicaluseful KM system. This is when technology can really
information access, streamlined reporting, automation,enhance the system by extending its reach and
reduced errors and more efficient processes. On theproviding a historical warehouse of implementations.
other hand, technology has fallen short of its fullBut, when the suggestion box isn't used
potential in healthcare, as too many competingappropriately, then having the latest, greatest,
systems make integrated data difficult to obtain.technologically advanced computer suggestion box
Additionally, the burdens of data entry and analysiswon't improve anything. Once again, an organization
burdens overwhelm rather than streamlinerequires a "learning" culture to value the collaborative
processes.Healthcare faces these mistakes if itlearning obtained through KM systems.Some
"applies" technology to organizational Knowledgeorganizations overcome these obstacles by using
Management (KM) without first identifying KM goalstechnology as a tool instead of as a solution.
and understanding how a KM system will be used byTechnology can enhance knowledge exchange by
administrators, physicians, managers, and staff.providing multiple access models (interactive events
Technology facilitates knowledge exchange, but it isand data warehouses) and widespread distribution of
not the end-all to managing knowledge effectively.new and innovative ideas. Thoughtful abstracting and
Technology designed to enhance the interactionarchiving of events and documents enable managers
among a community of similar-minded participants,to actively apply lessons learned by others and
such as healthcare employees, can greatly enhanceapplies knowledge to their daily work.Managing
the exchange of knowledge. But it is the process andCompeting Expectations of Users and
culture of an organization rather than the level ofAdministratorsUnless it fills some need and is easily
applied technology that make a KM system a wealthaccessible in one's daily routine, a KM system will
or void of retrievable information.An effective KMprobably be ignored. Healthcare runs at a hectic pace
system is built on communication and education andand staff needs to spend as little time as possible
thrives in organizations encouraging shared learningnavigating a KM system to obtain useful information.
both within and outside of the hospital walls. TheseAdministrators will not support KM efforts unless
systems store historical knowledge and knowledgethey see demonstrated results. Consider the following
created during exchanges of information amongcriteria when weighing the pros and cons of a KM
people who are interested in learning. Knowledgesystem:· What is the organization's purpose for
management systems designed with goals in mind,the KM system?· Where is the existing
versus just acquiring the most advanced technology,knowledge?· How is the knowledge
is what will support healthcare organizations intransferred?· Who will have access to the
streamlining processes, reducing costs and improvingsystem?· How will access privileges vary among
care.Why Knowledge Management instaff members?· How will each department use
Healthcare?Healthcare industry professionals arethe system?· How will ideas be exchanged,
realizing that previous efforts, (e.g. searching for thein-house exclusively or
elusive "best practice" and applying it as awith other organizations?· What is the structure
commodity), bureaucratic and toothless performanceof the KM system? Will it just
improvement initiatives and poorly thought-out ITcreate directories of experts or will it also create
implementations, have not led to improved resultsactive learning communities (active learning)?·
and reduced costs. As a mindset, KM attachesWhat amount of support will be required at each
importance to knowledge and identifies the value oflevel?· How user-friendly is it?It never serves an
knowledge at different levels. As a framework, KMorganization to design a system with all the fancy
facilitates knowledge access and transfer, which helpsbells and whistles, just for the sake of having slick
change behaviors and improve decisions. Knowledgefeatures. Create a KM system consistent with the
management systems support healthcare workers inway the hospital staff will use it. If the purpose is to
using available knowledge to develop organizationalinspire employees to think 'outside the box', systems
learning. This learning assists the employees incan be designed to facilitate this. The best way to
critiquing a compilation of practice ideas andmanage competing expectations is to understand it all
successfully designing a customized "Best Practice"upfront. The healthcare industry, especially, does not
for the organization. A good KM system can helphave the bankroll to pay for underutilized
staff create and exploit new knowledge. It is capablefeatures.Key Components for A Successful KM
of driving decisions, change and improvements to allSystem:1. Fulfills organizational goals. A KM system
levels of the organization. And, in this era ofstructured around an organization's goals will support
escalating costs and declining reimbursements, anthe efforts of employees to reach these goals. John
effective KM system is virtually essential to aAger, Team Coordinator of the Endoscopy
healthcare organization's process improvement andDepartment for Sentara Healthcare Systems, located
cost reduction strategies.Hospitals can be isolatedin Virginia Beach, Virginia, has participated in monthly
places, which make it tough to gather 'knowledge'.teleconference calls with colleagues nationwide. "It is
The clinical side has the measurable research andpart of my hospital's goal to do benchmarking. This
knows the outcomes, but the operational side of thehospital is very strong on sharing information and the
hospital lacks this information. Consider this example.previous methods were not effective. Prior to the
A hospital's operational staff may be well aware ofteleconference calls, we were doing phone
the increased benefit to changing one of its productscommunication, which was difficult at best. Now we
used for patient care management. Nevertheless, thehave set scheduled times on a monthly basis and we
staff struggles when it comes to demonstrating thejust recently picked up using computer-based
cost/benefit to administration and to the physicians.knowledge."2. Addresses social networks. If
A KM system offers a hospital staff access toemployees feel like they belong to a particular group,
strategies and contacts so they can learn how othersthen they are more likely to share successes and
have successfully carried out similar situations.Can Wefailures with that group. Sharing failures is especially
Talk?Hospital staff is willing to share their knowledgebeneficial to a knowledge management system since
with others in the field, although it's often donepeople tend to learn more effectively when they're
informally, such as networking at a convention ortold/shown what not to do. Develop knowledge
conversations with internal and external peers.communities or communities of practice (COP's)
Effective KM systems capitalize on thesearound functional and clinical topics. Orchestrate
opportunities.How does a KM system changeevents where staff can share experiences (especially
behaviors and improve decisions? One hospitalfailures) without fear of censure.Collective history of
department is concerned with retaining staff,a social network is important. The background
especially in light of the current nursing shortage.information from all participants in a COP builds a
Typically, the manager struggles with the staffingshared, historical base, which solidifies commitment to
issues alone or relies on a few peers within thethe group process and increases exchanges. "I've
department. Yet, what if the manager could connectreally enjoyed the participation," says Ager. "It has
with a peer internally and solicit his or her advice,really helped me get a better picture of the field I'm
even though this employee works in an unrelatedin because I'm actually having a one-on-one
department? The insight and perspective from animmediate interaction with somebody as opposed to
"outsider" may be very useful. How about contactingthe old process where you'd have a fixed set of
peers at other facilities? An effective KM systemquestions you'd e-mail to them. Then, you'd try to call
would facilitate 'experience sharing' among peoplethem to get answers or they would fax their
struggling with staffing issues. It also archives theanswers back to you. It wasn't as clear and concise.
solutions brainstormed from the interaction to use asThis is ongoing and I like the immediate and personal
a basis for growing the collective knowledge of theresponse back," explains Ager.3. Archives existing
group. This information is then readily accessible theknowledge. Create historical records by categorizing
next time a hospital manager (within the hospital orand abstracting knowledge gleaned from interactions.
from another facility) faces retention issues.AnotherMake it easy for users to locate relevant learning.
method hospitals typically use to gain knowledge isAger uses his KM system to share documentation
gathering ideas from a multitude of experts, as isprior to the actual teleconference with the other
done when attending a conference or a convention.participants. They use spreadsheets and data
Yet, how is that information disseminated throughoutmanagement for references when talking on the
the hospital or healthcare organization if only twotelephone. "I've found this aspect beneficial because
employees attended the convention? If it is difficultas we are talking, I'm able to look at the information
to share and build ideas within one department orfirsthand and it spurs questions for me too," says
even throughout one hospital, how can anyoneAger. Additionally, all participants receive e-mail
expect cross-hospital exchanges to prove fruitful?summations of the teleconference (created by the
Obviously, it is more difficult to share informationKM system coordinator). Call topics are based on the
when individuals are not physically together and evensuggestions and questions introduced in previous
more complex when the individuals are employees ofteleconferences. If one facility has a specific question,
different healthcare organizations. The benefits ofthe coordinator will request examples related to this
sharing such a huge reservoir of knowledge arequestion from all participants, summarize the
colossal. Technology is a must in theseinformation and then forward it to all facilities.4.
cases.Knowledge Management ≠ InformationFacilitates "new" knowledge. Knowledge comes from
TechnologyEffective KM cannot be thought of, normany sources including knowledge forums,
treated, as simply another exercise in informationconference calls, research articles, surveys, and
technology. Unfortunately, due to the access andopinion polls. Encourage participants to exchange ideas
distribution enhancements technology provides,and share experiences, challenges and successes.
healthcare administrators often have a distorted viewMost people are not able to develop an action plan
of a KM system as an information technologysimply by reading or analyzing data. Rather, they are
system or as a solution that needs to be applied.more inspired by talking and exchanging ideas.
While technology enhances sharing and informationAccording to Ager, "Participating in the
exchange, even the most technologically advancedteleconference calls is one of the best ways of
KM system will not solve every dilemma. The keyssharing information that I've been exposed to in the
to a successful KM implementation are:· Identifylast nine years since I've been working for this facility.
the knowledge to exchange and distribute·It's given me real time data and real people to talk
Determine how knowledge will be managed·to. Issues constantly change. At one point, staffing
Match technology and resources appropriately to thewas a priority at several of the facilities and because
culture and needs of the organizationAnother fallacywe shared information, other facilities implemented
about KM is that "knowledge" can be reduced tothe shared ideas when it was the right time for
documents and then warehoused in a computerthem. It's easier than looking at a piece of paper with
database for people to access as needed. Theraw data on it wondering what to do with it."Moving
improvement resulting from a KM system comesForwardThe explosion of information technology and
from personal interaction, the sharing of experiences,its instant accessibility have created powerful
taking action and recording the results, growingsolutions for the healthcare business. Healthcare must
collective knowledge of a group and building newinvest its resources and technology wisely. A carefully
knowledge from the experiences of others.considered and well-resourced KM implementation will
Technology based solely on warehousing knowledgeenable organizations to leverage data, knowledge and
"documents" or best practices are not successful inexperience to improve patient care and lower
driving change and improvement in the organization.Ithealthcare costs. Why 'reinvent these conversations'
takes resources beyond technology to managewhen they've already taken place countless times?
knowledge effectively. Group interactions must beKM systems designed to serve an organization's
facilitated, results must be archived and reinvested ingoals, and built to foster social interactions that
the knowledge pool and management actions andencourage the exchange of knowledge, will assist
change must be supported by the organization.organizations in revolutionizing healthcare.Sidebar: Keys
Effectively managing and leveraging knowledge in anto Generating New Knowledge
organization cannot be abdicated to the ITUse these ideas when designing a KM system:·
system.Apply Thoughtful TechnologyOrganizationsCreate Communities of Practice (COP)·
have a habit of buying the latest, greatest KMModerate COP processes to extract learning·
system on the market, if for no other reason thanMake continuous learning available· Determine
because others have done the same. Yet, elaboratehow successes are shared and how failures are
systems that aren't called for tend to breedcommunicated· Analyze failure for future
reluctance. Does the hospital or healthcarelearning· Generate, abstract and categorize
organization really need the latest and greatest?historical knowledge records· Provide multiple
When analyzing the implementation of a KM system,access paths for participantsShelley Burns is director
first determine what is really necessary to meet theof knowledge management at The Healthcare
hospital's needs. For instance, take the simpleManagement Council Inc., a benchmarking and
suggestion box. Are the employees making practicalperformance improvement firm in Needham, MA.
suggestions or snide comments? Is the suggestion