| This article is also available on our website: | | | | regarded as an asset by most accounting and tax |
| PROACTION - Generating Best Practices. It is an | | | | rules. Therefore, increasing inventories shows "profits" |
| excerpt of a paper originally written by George Miller, | | | | and profits are usually taxed, usually by multiple |
| Founder of PROACTION. It has been modified and | | | | government entities. |
| updated by Paul Deis, PROACTION CEO. | | | | • Insurance - The cost of carrying insurance on |
| Overview | | | | inventory needs to be considered, as well as insuring |
| In spite of the great advances in industrial | | | | the space, equipment, people and other resources |
| management in areas such as JIT, Flow | | | | needed to control it. |
| Manufacturing, Lean Manufacturing, MRP/MRPII, ERP | | | | • Space - Costly storage space sometimes |
| and Supply Chain Management, and now, Electronic | | | | occupies 25-30% of the total facility, when one |
| Commerce, inventory investment management | | | | considers raw material warehouses, stockrooms, |
| continues to be a major issue for many organizations. | | | | work-in-process storage, receiving, shipping, outside |
| Installing the latest software and mouthing the most | | | | warehouses, MRB and residual storage areas. |
| popular buzzwords is no guarantee of good inventory | | | | Inventory reduction campaigns can help companies |
| management. As with almost all Best Practices, it is | | | | avoid the need to move to large facilities, or permit |
| the effective use of available tools by properly | | | | them to shut down or cut back existing facilities. |
| educated and trained people that creates the desired | | | | • Manpower - All of this inventory needs people |
| result. | | | | to order, receive inspect, record, move, count, store, |
| This paper covers how to set up and maintain | | | | retrieve, post it to the ledger, etc. People are the |
| Aggregate Inventory Management for improved | | | | largest or second largest expense (behind material) |
| investment and operations management. It is a | | | | for most manufacturers. |
| "macro," top-down approach that complements a | | | | • Record Keeping Systems - Software, |
| company's "micro" SKU (part number) level | | | | procedures, equipment and paper must be used to |
| management techniques. | | | | track and control inventory. |
| Definition, Goal and Objective | | | | • Material Handling/Storage Equipment - |
| • Definition—the APICS Dictionary defines | | | | Conveyors, fork lifts, bar code readers, scales, |
| Aggregate Inventory Management as "Establishing | | | | automated storage and retrieval systems, trucks, |
| the overall levels of inventory desired and | | | | carts, bins, racks, shelves must all be purchased, |
| implementing controls to ensure that individual | | | | leased, maintained and cared for. |
| replenishment decisions achieve this goal." | | | | • Physical Inventories, Reconciliations - Must be |
| It includes: | | | | conducted to ensure that inventories are properly |
| • How to assess overall investment levels and set | | | | accounted for and maintained. |
| targets. | | | | • Transportation - Must be provided to move |
| • How to identify inventory investment level | | | | inventory in and out of the facility, to vendors, within |
| "drivers" and help control them | | | | the facility, to different workstations and storage |
| • How to link aggregate inventory management | | | | areas. |
| "macro" strategy to "micro" controls and develop | | | | • Energy - Heat, light, humidity control, air |
| accountability | | | | conditioning, refrigeration and fuel must be consumed |
| • Performance measurements | | | | to make all this happen. |
| • Specific techniques, such as ABC analysis, | | | | • Inappropriate Lot Sizing - In inventory formulae, |
| control parameters, inventory buildup charts, and | | | | the carrying cost of inventory is often expressed as |
| input-output control. | | | | a flat percentage of the inventory value, for |
| • Goal—Helps manage assets and make | | | | convenience of computations, but that is an |
| money. | | | | oversimplification of reality. For instance, consider |
| • Objective—Optimize inventory levels within | | | | material handling/storage costs. Just because a dollar |
| the parameters of service, cost, logistics, process | | | | of inventory is added, doesn't mean that carrying |
| and investment objectives/constraints. Inventory | | | | costs go up, say, $.02. In reality the costs would not |
| management should be exercised to keep the lowest | | | | usually go up in a direct proportion at all, but only |
| level of inventory consistent with achieving the | | | | when we had to pay for an additional expense, or |
| objectives. Too much inventory reduces Return on | | | | make the next capital investment in equipment or |
| Investment and Return on Assets (lower profits). It | | | | space to accommodate the inventory. So actually, |
| also tends to increase expenses, in the form of | | | | most of these costs are step functions, rather than |
| interest payments, handling and storage, | | | | continuous curves. |
| management, damage, loss, obsolescence, tracking, | | | | We urge caution in the use of so-called EOQ |
| taxes, insurance, etc. | | | | (Economic Order Quantity) formulae in planning. While |
| Although most managers, accountants and taxing | | | | these can be useful guidelines in some cases, they |
| authorities regard inventory as an asset, treating it as | | | | can easily go awry and are hypersensitive to changes |
| such for operational purposes may create liabilities. | | | | in carrying costs and order costs, which are usually |
| You have probably heard stories about factories | | | | no more than guesstimates, at best. We smile in |
| working to "keep people busy" or maximize | | | | amusement at PhD's made or lost on the study of |
| "efficiency" and other similar nonsense. If they are | | | | such arcane calculations, often failing to consider basic |
| making inventory that is not needed now, they are | | | | realities such as; how much space and money do we |
| often wasting money. If they work just to keep | | | | have, anyway? You can refer to Paul's book, |
| people busy, they are still consuming material, energy | | | | Production & Inventory Management in the |
| and other resources that may not earn adequate | | | | Technological Age, pages 137 to 139 for a detailed |
| profits. They may use resources that could better be | | | | explanation of why this lot sizing method is weak and |
| used for more immediate and profitable needs. If | | | | should be used with caution. |
| inventory is deployed improperly, it may create | | | | • Supply variation—refers to the reliability of |
| liabilities. A customer of one of our clients had branch | | | | the supplier to deliver the desired units in the needed |
| managers who would "hoard" products at their | | | | quantity, at the right time, at an acceptable quality |
| remote branches so that they "wouldn't run out." | | | | level. If this can't be done reliably, then companies |
| This created an excess of material in the wrong | | | | tend to carry a buffer (safety) stock to make up for |
| places. | | | | the deficiencies in the supply system. |
| How to Assess Inventory Investment Requirements | | | | • Demand variation - refers to the ability to |
| Survey | | | | reliably forecast what the customer will require |
| First, understand market, customer needs and | | | | (whether that is an internal or an external customer). |
| service expectations; your own company needs, | | | | Lower reliability tends to encourage buffer (safety) |
| expectations, process, abilities; supplier abilities and | | | | stocks. |
| mindset; industry norms and mindset; world-class | | | | • Defects —Extra inventory is often carried to |
| best practices. | | | | allow for probable rejections. This is just a specialized |
| From this, you should learn how fast and reliably | | | | form of safety stock for supply and demand |
| customers expect to get their shipments, what is | | | | buffering. |
| involved to get raw materials and production | | | | • Logistics constraints/transportation costs - This |
| completed, what the best in the industry are doing | | | | also sometimes falls under the heading of supply and |
| and plan to do, and what might be possible. For | | | | demand variation and it certainly can affect it. For |
| instance, if all competitors are shipping from stock, | | | | example, one of our clients transports parts by |
| then you will either need to duplicate that feat, or | | | | ocean freight to a plant in Portugal, or at least they |
| determine how to manufacture very fast, or | | | | do that if they don't have to ship by air to get them |
| convince customers that your product is so great or | | | | there faster. Because ships traveling between |
| so cheap that it is in their interest to wait while you | | | | economical ports only leave every few weeks, a 20 |
| make it to order. Or, you might figure out how to | | | | or 40 foot long container is the most practical |
| procure better or manufacture better in a way that | | | | shipping size. A certain amount of time is required for |
| allows you to carry less inventory. | | | | packing, transportation to the terminal, Loading, |
| The result of this step is to establish what industry | | | | transport, unloading, customs and transport to the |
| inventory standards might be and what is possible. | | | | consignee. These are very real logistics constraints |
| Make sure you have an "apples-to-apples" | | | | that must be built into the "pipeline" portion of the |
| comparison: there may be significant differences | | | | inventory model. |
| among companies. For example: One company might | | | | Another company studied ships fresh flowers from |
| stock finished goods, another one may sell it to | | | | Latin America to the U.S. Air freight is the only |
| another division or to a distributor. | | | | feasible way to handle shipment, due to shelf life and |
| Measure Current and Historical Inventory Levels and | | | | care issues. It results in a shorter "pipeline" and higher |
| Performance | | | | transportation costs, which end up either directly |
| Measure current and historical company inventory | | | | costed to inventory, or get rolled into overhead, or |
| levels and performance, not just overall statistics, but | | | | cost of sales—same ultimate effect. |
| broken down into levels of responsibility, commodity, | | | | As unit costs rise, so will inventory, but the turns, or |
| area, type (raw material, work-in-process, finished | | | | days coverage, will remain the same. |
| goods, consignment) and market. Do this to help | | | | How to set Inventory Targets |
| isolate figures down to levels of accountability and to | | | | After considering the current situation, drivers, and |
| show inventory investment performance by market, | | | | external situation, estimate what inventory levels |
| process or even product line. You may find that your | | | | should be, given certain sets of circumstances. There |
| systems are unable to do that, meaning that it is | | | | are impressive supply chain modeling tools to help |
| past time to make changes to them, whether that | | | | you do this. Our experience is that developing an |
| be to replace them, modify them or put in separate | | | | accurate detailed inventory behavior model is quite a |
| inventory tracking and control systems | | | | chore to create and a major task to maintain, so we |
| (recommended as a last resort). | | | | usually don't. Normally working on projects with |
| The result of this step is to establish how your own | | | | limited budgets, we study past behavior and focus |
| company is doing and has been doing with inventory | | | | on the main drivers, seeking to change a few with |
| management. | | | | the greatest potential impact to achieve assigned |
| Establish Performance Metrics | | | | objectives- sort of a "delta' approach. |
| Establish performance metrics - Inventory is usually | | | | Don't let us talk you out of sophisticated modeling |
| measured in currency value, such as U.S. Dollars | | | | tools, though. They have their place. When there are |
| ($USD). Another, complementary way is to measure | | | | very large amounts of money involved and/or tricky |
| it in velocity. For example, you might measure it in | | | | constraints to work around, modeling tools will |
| "turns" which relates to how many times it moves or | | | | sometimes help. Many of the detailed control |
| "turns over" per year. For example, if there was an | | | | methods presented below contain elements of |
| average of $100 in inventory in the last year and | | | | modeling. |
| annual cost of sales for the last year was $2000, | | | | Warning: Calculating or modeling inventory behavior |
| that would be calculated as cost of sales ($2000) | | | | solely by using the rules and parameters will nearly |
| average inventory ($100)= 20 turns. | | | | always be wrong. Why: If, for example, you assume |
| More turns (or "turnover") is usually good, provided | | | | that inventory will be an average of ½ times the |
| that cost, service or quality aren't unacceptably | | | | order quantity plus safety stock, you'll most often be |
| affected. If they are, the answer is not simply to | | | | wrong. Actual supply and demand variability will differ. |
| increase inventory, but to try to improve the | | | | Defective items/customer returns may result in |
| underlying "drivers" influencing it instead, if possible | | | | buildup. Unmatched sets of parts due to shortages |
| and cost-effective. There are variations of the | | | | will result in buildup. Generally, it is higher than the |
| turnover (this term should not be confused with the | | | | model would indicate. |
| European "turnover," which usually refers to total | | | | Even the best laid plans can go off track if something |
| sales for a period) formula, mainly in addressing how | | | | changes unexpectedly- a major customer cuts |
| to calculate average cost of goods sold or inventory. | | | | orders, unexpected defects occur, requiring ad-hoc |
| Sometimes, turns are calculated by comparing full | | | | reaction, rather than careful, deliberate, advanced |
| sales value with average inventory cost or even | | | | planning. |
| equivalent sales value. To maintain easily comparable | | | | There are two major directions to approach |
| figures, state all numbers in fully "burdened" costs, | | | | inventory management from—Top-Down and |
| using industry standard overhead/burden calculations, | | | | Bottom-Up. Most successful companies use a |
| unless this is contrary to the standards of your | | | | combination of both. |
| industry or locality. Hopefully, future standard world | | | | • Top-Down — this is the "macro" approach. |
| accounting practices may help to reduce confusion in | | | | Start with a goal, objectives, ABC (Pareto) analysis |
| this area. | | | | of estimated or historical usage, knowledge of overall |
| It is becoming more common to measure inventory | | | | processes and lead times. Set overall targets, by |
| performance in days coverage instead of turnover. | | | | business unit at a minimum, preferably at a lower |
| People seem to relate to it better. | | | | level, so that middle managers or even individual |
| Inventory and sales may also be commonly | | | | supervisors, work teams or administrative control |
| measured in more industry-friendly terms, such as | | | | personnel might be held more accountable. It takes |
| tons (steel), bushels (corn), housing units | | | | more effort as the control is moved to a lower level. |
| (construction or real estate) or ounces (gold). | | | | Establish a tracking system, such as actual inventory |
| A further refinement is to stratify the inventory by | | | | versus target level. Compare numbers to actual sales, |
| "Quality," as asserted by Gary Gossard of IQR | | | | forecast. Monitor commitments and production plans |
| International. The idea of classifying inventory as | | | | against targets... Hold managers accountable for |
| active, slow-moving or obsolete has been around for | | | | results and make them come back with reasons why |
| a long time. Constantly track it, to highlight any | | | | targets cannot be met and solutions to the problems. |
| change in inventory quality or condition, such as a | | | | Motivate them to solve underlying problems. Help |
| new requisition for an item which is already in excess | | | | them with problems outside of their scope of |
| or obsolete. The active, weighted "good" inventory | | | | authority. |
| not exceeding your "days coverage" target, divided | | | | Another good tracking tool is Input-Output Control. |
| by the total inventory, multiplied by 100, it equals the | | | | Simply build a time-phased table of planned starting |
| Inventory Quality Ratio (IQR) number. 33-40% is | | | | and ending inventories, showing starting, input, output |
| typical for mediocre companies. 66% is considered | | | | and results. Then task employees to make the |
| pretty good. | | | | "delta's" happen and track the actual values per |
| All of these numbers can be time-phased, to show | | | | period. |
| changes over time, due, for example, to seasonal | | | | • Bottom-Up—Look at each item- determine |
| supply and demand changes, or planned | | | | cost, lead times, supply and demand reliability |
| improvements. These can then be applied in still more | | | | variability, defect rate, transportation, storage, set-up |
| detail to the appropriate organizations, product lines, | | | | batch size considerations, buffers, process, handling |
| trade channels, warehouses, planning groups or other | | | | considerations. Then set the proper planning methods |
| responsible entities and then monitored for results. | | | | and control parameters, to either default down from |
| The numbers should be capable of being "drilled" | | | | the enterprise, product line, commodity or |
| down or up, from the entire enterprise level to an | | | | department level to default down, or just establish |
| individual SKU (Stock-Keeping Unit) transaction or part | | | | them at the item/part level. |
| number. Managers or employees should be able to | | | | This takes a lot more effort than merely exercising |
| look at total figures for their areas of responsibility | | | | Top-Down control, but it can deliver better results. |
| and readily identify specific problem areas down to | | | | Educate and train people in inventory management |
| lower levels and finally to specific items, policies, | | | | and control approaches. |
| orders and decisions that accounted for them. | | | | How to Control Inventory |
| Here are typical Inventory System Metrics, which | | | | After you do all your research and analysis, set |
| should be broken down by organization/responsibility, | | | | targets and establish your control system, then you |
| area, type, commodity, market/product, and time | | | | get to the hard part - actually making it happen. |
| phased, with targets and actual values: | | | | Quick hits - Simply establishing the aggregate targets, |
| • Inventory Turnover or Days Coverage | | | | understanding drivers, educating and training, setting |
| • Inventory value or other unit of measure, such | | | | up responsibility, establishing accountability and |
| as tons | | | | tracking results usually has significant effects. I have |
| • Inventory "Quality," including IQR and summaries | | | | seen greater than 50% reductions from this alone. |
| of amounts of each type | | | | This can be the cheapest, fastest way of making |
| • Customer service level, expressed how the | | | | some change happen, but it has a limited effect, |
| CUSTOMER perceives it | | | | because the approach lacks detail and won't make |
| ABC Analysis | | | | major permanent changes in the ways that the |
| Perform an ABC analysis, a simple, common and | | | | business works without additional actions. |
| powerful tool for inventory management. It is based | | | | What is "Control?" - Control means to make |
| on Pareto's law of "80-20." The most common | | | | something happen or to know why if it doesn't, so |
| approach is to calculate demand in units, preferably | | | | that something might be done about it. Using that |
| for future periods, then calculate the total usage | | | | definition, there is no such thing as an uncontrollable |
| value at cost for each item (total cost of sales | | | | situation. Someone once told me that he couldn't |
| multiplied by units required) for a given future period. | | | | control service inventory, because of unreliable |
| If future demand data are not available, the next | | | | vendor lead times. Nonsense! Unreliable lead times |
| best thing is to use history, but this won't work well | | | | might be controlled by several strategies, such as: |
| for items with major swings in demand over time. | | | | multiple sourcing, re-sourcing, safety stock, exhorting |
| Sequence these in descending value. Typically, the | | | | supplier to improve performance, ordering sooner, |
| top 10 to 15% of items account for 75-85% of value | | | | improving your own planning and reaction times, |
| ("A" items), the next 20-30% account for 10-20% of | | | | changing designs, alternate routing, training customers |
| value ("B" items) and everything else accounts for | | | | to order differently, having vendors stock raw |
| the rest, about 60-70% of the items, usually about | | | | materials. At least some of these would work in |
| 5% of the total value ("C" items). Your inventory | | | | almost any situation. |
| should be less than these percentages for the "A" | | | | Detailed Control Methods |
| items, because they are much more tightly controlled | | | | Most of the detailed control methods that follow |
| and a little higher for B's and significantly higher for | | | | have some inventory management rationale built in, |
| C's. | | | | but it must be properly set-up and tuned for best |
| Then compare the list to actual values in inventory, | | | | use. Provide and implement control tools such as: |
| plus actual and planned commitments. The answers | | | | • Order on demand- Order only to fill customer |
| will often suggest immediate corrective actions! | | | | orders. This is the most direct, intuitive method and |
| An ABC list suggests what to concentrate on to | | | | tends to avoid excess inventory. It will only work if it |
| control most of the inventory investment. What it | | | | can meet customers' lead time and cost |
| doesn't tell you is that being short of a $.10 screw | | | | expectations. It works best for custom ordering and |
| might prevent the shipment of a $5,000,000 radar | | | | when it will result in delivery service meeting |
| unit, so ensure that there are control systems for all | | | | customers' expectations. |
| items, just control the expensive ones much more | | | | In most cases, organizations must anticipate |
| carefully. Err on the side of caution for the cheaper | | | | customer wishes to be successful. This often |
| items, allowing a safety stock coverage or "two bin" | | | | involves committing inventory in advance, to be able |
| approach to avoid stock outs, but keep inventory | | | | to deliver in time and to produce in economical |
| from getting out of control. | | | | quantities. So other techniques are often used, such |
| Create an Inventory Buildup Chart | | | | as: |
| Another good analysis tool is the inventory buildup | | | | • Reorder point- Keep a certain amount available |
| chart. Use a standard x-y coordinate chart. Plot the | | | | and on order to help ensure that it is available when |
| cost build-up over time, by product group, with cost | | | | needed, but not in excessive quantities. |
| on the "y" (vertical axis) and time on the "x" | | | | • Min-max- This is a modified form of order point, |
| (horizontal) axis. Normally, raw material cost | | | | with upper and lower limits established. |
| accumulates first over time, followed by labor and | | | | • Kanban- This is a more sophisticated type of |
| overhead application. Allow for safety stocks, lot size | | | | reorder point. Instead of having a single order point, |
| inventory, transit stock, defects/rework/scrap, and | | | | with a relatively large and lumpy order quantity, one |
| normal finished goods and distribution pipeline | | | | replenishes a smaller quantity every time it is |
| stocking. Show the affect of consignment | | | | consumed. This method was popularized by its |
| arrangements. Some people also treat accounts | | | | success at the Toyota Motor Company in Japan. |
| receivable as sort of a de facto inventory, until it is | | | | • MRP (Material Requirements Planning) - |
| paid for. Once this chart is completed, show it around | | | | formalized in the 1950's by Dr. Joseph Orlicky, MRP |
| for shock value. Presented correctly, it will really | | | | uses a master schedule developed from a demand |
| make people think about the effect of constraints | | | | analysis of orders, forecast and production plans. It |
| and decisions (just another form of constraint) on | | | | then considers available inventory, parts requirements |
| inventory. Then, work on changing the rules! | | | | calculated from the bill of materials, then factors in |
| One company had a 14 month buildup curve, which | | | | open purchase orders, lead times, logistical |
| was reduced to 4 months. At another company, the | | | | considerations, safety stock and other ordering rules, |
| longest lead time material item accounted for only | | | | to develop a materials purchasing and factory |
| 20% of the product cost, so stocking only that item, | | | | schedule to meet planned and actual demand. |
| instead of finished goods or instead of only reacting | | | | In current times, a company's MRP system is often a |
| to orders, enabled them to radically reduce the | | | | subset of its ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) or |
| response time for orders by 70%. It also added the | | | | Supply Chain Management System, which |
| flexibility of being able to use that raw material to | | | | incorporates MRP as only one portion of an overall |
| make a number of different end items. | | | | "Enterprise" level system. MRP is not always the |
| How to Identify and Control Inventory Drivers | | | | most appropriate approach for all environments. In |
| Inventory drivers are things that tend to make | | | | recent years, it has been modified successfully, by |
| inventory go up or down. Identify them and you will | | | | incorporating techniques of Kanban, JIT, Lean |
| have some clue of why inventory changes. | | | | Manufacturing, Repetitive Scheduling, Theory of |
| Understanding them is the beginning of gaining control. | | | | Constraints and others. |
| I've stated things that would drive inventory up, e.g.: | | | | • DRP (Distribution Requirements Planning) — |
| more SKU's. I refrain from stating the obvious: doing | | | | this is a specialized form of MRP, for distribution |
| the opposite would reduce inventory. e.g.: reduce | | | | networks. It uses the same principles, but may also |
| SKU's to reduce inventory. | | | | consider the dynamics of multi-level distribution |
| Key Drivers are covered briefly, as follows: | | | | networks, service level planning, cross-docking, |
| Number of SKUs | | | | shipment staging, truck loading, inventory deployment |
| The more items you have, the more inventory you | | | | optimization and other considerations. |
| will need, in most cases. If you sell 500 widgets a | | | | • Supply Chain Planning/Optimization- This is the |
| year of A, then replace it with 250/year of A and | | | | next level of sophistication for MRP and DRP. It |
| 250 of B, you will probably need to carry more | | | | creates a model of the supply chain, which may |
| inventory. Why: demand and supply variability and | | | | include suppliers, manufacturing, various levels of |
| total economic order quantities are likelier to be | | | | distribution and even monitoring of inventory through |
| higher for 2 items than for one. | | | | one or more levels of customer ownership. |
| The more SKU's in a product, the harder it is to bring | | | | • Repetitive scheduling- Designed for continuous |
| matched sets of parts together at the same time. | | | | flow production. |
| Because there are multiple items, with multiple | | | | • Process monitoring/control - Control of an |
| vendors, kept and routed through multiple places or | | | | ongoing, often continuous, process, usually by |
| paths, with more opportunity for delays, defects, | | | | monitoring and controlling process parameters, such |
| etc, more inventory will be needed. | | | | as raw material properties, desired attributes, |
| The more operations there are and the longer that | | | | temperature, pressure, speeds, viscosity, finish, |
| they take, the more inventory you will tend to have. | | | | byproducts, etc. |
| More operations mean a longer supply chain. It may | | | | • Safety stock/safety lead time - Most of the |
| also mean differing lot sizes per operation and more | | | | above techniques might be enhanced by building in |
| places for delays and defects to occur. Process | | | | supply and demand buffers to allow for fluctuations |
| simplification helps reduce inventory. | | | | uncertainty of what will be needed and when and |
| The more facilities that inventory passes in and out | | | | what supply will arrive and when. It can be done by |
| of, the further apart those are and the harder they | | | | adding on a fixed quantity or time coverage. The |
| are to reach and pass material in and out of, the | | | | trouble with this approach is that people tend to |
| more inventory you will tend to have. | | | | make the wrong allowances, usually on the high side. |
| The more times inventory passes from the control | | | | This inflates inventory, may actually confuse priorities |
| of one system or organization to another and the | | | | and use up needed capacity, by working on things |
| less efficient the transfer is, the more inventory you | | | | not actually needed. The best approach is to try to |
| will tend to have. | | | | reduce process variation for supply and demand, so |
| Lot/Batch Sizes | | | | that less safety stock is needed. |
| Lot/batch sizes greater than customer order delivery | | | | • Vendor-Managed Inventory - a form of |
| sizes tend to increase inventory. If customers order | | | | delegation that is proving to be quite popular and |
| a product one at a time, but economics, handling or | | | | sometimes very successful. One provides the supplier |
| process considerations suggest that you make 1000 | | | | with demand and logistics data and makes him |
| at a time, then you will have more inventory available | | | | responsible for ensuring that the right quantities are |
| than will be consumed per order, resulting in an | | | | available at the right time and place for you to meet |
| accumulation of inventory. If you need to order | | | | demand. It needs cooperation, monitoring and |
| things in cases, dozens, carloads, tons or weeks' | | | | common interests and objectives to be successful. |
| supply, but they are needed downstream in the | | | | • Input/Output - Don't forget to implement the |
| supply chain in smaller increments, you will tend to | | | | input-output method, described earlier as a tool to |
| accumulate more inventory. | | | | help make reductions. |
| The longer the lead time, the more inventory you | | | | Pitfalls of using control parameters |
| tend to have. If something takes 16 weeks to get | | | | With the use of MRP, MRPII, ERP and now "Supply |
| instead of 16 days, there is more inventory needed in | | | | Chain Management " systems, there are more |
| process to cover the "pipeline" time. Whether it | | | | opportunities to improve inventory management, but |
| belongs to you or your vendor, it is increasing | | | | also more chances to lose control! Unless there is a |
| somebody's cost, which ultimately will affect your | | | | clearly stated Aggregate Inventory Management |
| cost and your customer's cost. Longer lead time also | | | | approach imbedded in the system, through education, |
| means more chance of running out or having | | | | training and parameters, yes- I said parameters!, you |
| something go wrong out while waiting for it, which is | | | | will likely fail. |
| usually dealt with by having additional inventory. | | | | War story from George Miller: "Years ago, I worked |
| Carrying cost | | | | for a specialty niche MRPII/ERP company. After I left |
| This refers to the cost of owning inventory. Let's | | | | for the consulting world, a customer of that |
| look at what goes into inventory "cost of | | | | company called to inform me that the "software |
| ownership", frequently called the "carrying cost" and | | | | wasn't working" and summoned me to come and |
| expressed in terms of percent cost of inventory | | | | help them. After only a day on site, I told them that |
| valuation per year of ownership. For example, a 25% | | | | the problem was that the system was carrying out |
| carrying cost (typical) would indicate that it costs | | | | their instructions at the speed of light, spewing forth |
| about $.25 to own each $1.00 of inventory each year. | | | | recommendations to acquire inventory, based on |
| These costs consist of: | | | | their unrealistic parameters. You see, most of these |
| • Cost of money - The cost of capital to the | | | | systems have various ‘gauges' and "levers," to |
| company or, in some cases the "opportunity cost" or | | | | set control parameters to tailor the operation of the |
| return that might be earned on the money by | | | | system to the company, products and process. |
| applying it productively elsewhere. The cost of | | | | These might be set, for example, system-wide, but |
| money has ranged anywhere from 6% to 18% in | | | | can usually be overridden at the business unit, plant, |
| the USA in the last 25 years. Obviously, this has a | | | | department, product line and/or part number level. |
| very significant impact on investment strategy. | | | | Each level normally defaults down to the lower level, |
| • Obsolescence - The risk of inventory never | | | | unless you override it. |
| being used, or needing rework to make it usable, | | | | "For example, they used unrealistically long process |
| needs to be factored into the cost of owning | | | | times in the item master planning records and had |
| INVENTORY. In theory (and practice), the larger the | | | | safety stock and scrap factors planned at multiple |
| inventory is, and the longer it is held, the more likely | | | | levels in the bill of material, "pyramiding" (increasing) |
| engineering changes, customer preferences and | | | | demand calculations considerably. No surprise then, |
| technological changes will render that inventory | | | | except to them, that they were well upon their way |
| unusable. In the clothing industry, it is not uncommon | | | | to doubling their inventory investment in record time, |
| to see inventories depreciate as much as 90% when | | | | without significant benefits. The prescription was: |
| styles change. Certain portions of the electronics | | | | 1.The management team to get personally involved in |
| industry have problems with inventory becoming | | | | setting the system parameters. |
| obsolete very quickly, due to technological changes. | | | | 2.Educate employees in inventory management |
| • Shrinkage - A portion of inventory becomes | | | | concepts and train them in proper use of system |
| unavailable to the owner due to loss, damage, theft | | | | tools. |
| or spoilage. The longer inventory is there and the | | | | 3.Establish and monitor a special report to assess the |
| more there is, the more likely this is to happen. Steps | | | | effect of "order modifier" parameters, such as |
| to prevent it only raise carrying costs in other areas, | | | | safety stock, scrap and attrition factors, order |
| such as security, climate control, better control | | | | planning method, order quantity rules, order multiples, |
| systems, recruiting policies, etc. | | | | lead time, review time, inspection time." |
| • Quality Factors - Allowances for yield, attrition, | | | | Conclusion: Inventory can be systematically managed. |
| scrap and rework. This is really more of a function of | | | | It doesn't happen on its own. Needed is a rationale, a |
| the process than the amount of inventory invested | | | | plan, education, training, organization, tools, policies, |
| and is more related to throughput, but is sometimes | | | | procedures and management willpower. |
| included as part of the aggregate inventory carrying | | | | References: |
| cost. | | | | 1.APICS Dictionary, 7th Edition, APICS, Falls Church, |
| • Technological or Price Obsolescence - Prices | | | | VA |
| don't always go up. In fact, in industries such as | | | | 2.Production and Inventory Control, Second Edition, |
| electronics, prices often plummet due to constantly | | | | George W. Plossl, Prentice Hall, 1985 (originally 1967) |
| improving designs, product and process technology | | | | 3.Production and Inventory Management, Second |
| improvements. Therefore, it is desirable to minimize | | | | Edition, Fogarty, Blackstone, Hoffman, Southwestern |
| inventories in high-risk areas. | | | | Publishing, Cincinnati, Ohio, 1991 |
| • Taxes - There are two dimensions to this: 1) in | | | | 4.Inventory Reduction, George Miller, 1990. |
| some areas, a tax is levied on inventories, so the | | | | 5. |
| more inventory, the more tax is paid. 2) inventory is | | | | |