Changing Your Procurement Paradigm

The research driven Aberdeen Group recentlyrest is in margin rich small package and less than
determined than American businesses leavetruckload activity. Transportation is reeling from the
collectively $134 billion dollars on the procurementglobalization of providers that has brought new
negotiating table each year. Of course no business ispressures for cost containment and value driven
willing to admit that it could be them, it must otherservices. Already on their heals from shrinking long
businesses, not theirs.haul LTL/LCL markets (traditionally the most
The reality is American business does not like change.lucrative) and new technologies that create real time
Layered up, command and control hierarchies havevisibility to supply chains, asset providers have
no incentive to change, in fact, they often drive outunwittingly commoditized themselves with one
the people who bring light to ideas that threaten thedimensional operational management, no respect for
insecure, missing opportunities for leveraging savings,sales input on customer needs, or any true
building value and growing business. Automotive anddeliverable value for shippers. Leveraging their asset
retail examples lead the way but there are manyoverhead is primary as they bottom line driven.
stories across other industry sectors. Of particularShippers understand that most trade publications are
note is transportation procurement as since thefunded by asset and non asset providers so the
industry was deregulated in 1980, much has changedcontent is driven by bias, with of particular note the
in innovative options.so called "white papers" of how others have
The challenge for purchasers of transportation issucceeded, curiously via said providers. The
evaluating options. The monopoly in small packageadvantage has been with asset providers who live
puts fear in distributor's hearts so they are reluctantoff the predictability of shipper's procurement
to risk change. Even in bids, rarely do shippers changepractices, knowing their lack of willingness to take
small pack providers. Full truckload and internationalreasonable risks for change. Bids, reverse auctions
modes look and feel like transactional purchases butand even consultant driven negotiations are no threat
rarely do shippers make changes outside of theirto incumbent providers' relationship techniques.
limited exposure to the hundreds of optionsThe reality unfolding in transportation is the traditional
available...even when the options are lower cost andsales rep and transportation manager functions are
improved transit services. The less than truckloadbecoming obsolete. Neither is in a position to bring
mode has undergone the most change sinceconsistent value to the organizations they represent
deregulation. Shippers usually consider LTL the mostand the trends in the marketplace bear this out. A
problematic in risks, so change is resisted, stickingnew breed of transportation management provider
with "the devil they know."has emerged that leverage their superior buying
At the heart of transportation procurementpower, new web enabled technologies scaled to
inefficiencies are siloed company hierarchies that lackshipper needs for real time supply chain visibility and
respect for transportation management as potentialdedicated account support teams accessible for
leverage for containing costs, improving inventoryvarious shipper department needs whether for
management and/or growing sales. This leads to feartransactional moves, customized reporting tools or
driving risk taking, usually settling for providers theyenterprise deals. Shippers are moving to non asset
have relationships with, even in the face of blind bids,providers who are not tied to biased loyalties and
reverse auctions, or renegotiations. Asset basedhave value propositions that far exceed one
transportation providers know the odds are againstdimensional asset providers. The result is lower costs,
change and can predict what it will take to retainimproved transit times, less headaches from tracing,
market share. At least 10% of transportation spendbilling, cargo claims, (all leading to greater value to
is left on the negotiating table...with the averagegrow their own market shares),...and the knowledge
company 3% being attributed to transportationthat costs are not leaking out the back door with
costs, a $100mil/yr company costs itself $300,000/yrunknown missed opportunities to service/grow with
by being unable/unwilling to leverage their transtheir customers.
spend.So what are shippers to do? The trend is clear that
Shippers often have little respect for the salesthe only route, especially for small and mid cap
representation of transportation providers and forcompanies is to outsource their transportation
good reasons. High turnover of reps, operationalmanagement functions (most but not all billion dollar
rather than value driven processes (transportationcompanies can get at least good transactional rates
companies are inbred operational entities withon their own, though they still miss tech
homage to customers only in their marketingenhancements and support available at no cost). This
entertainment efforts), small package reps incentiseddoes not mean a loss of control or a compromise in
to protect market share with truckload andany way of service to their customers. In fact a
international providers pushing one solution and blurredtransportation management company only makes
pricing, often keeping shippers hostage to optionssense when savings, tech/supply chain visibility
and pricing/accessorial swings. The worst are oftenenhancements and dedicated support are guaranteed
less than truckload asset providers with inexperiencedcontractually. Since 74% of the Fortune 500
reps pushing one dimensional solutions to lure decisioncompanies have outsourced their transportation
makers to using what often is just the best of amanagement, how can small cap/mid cap companies
mediocre bunch. Shippers often complain about thethink they have leveraged savings when the largest
number of sales reps who knock on their door,corporations have long ago outsourced this function
dropping endless brochures and going over theirto benefit?
heads to sell their offerings. Unfortunately theseThink your asset provider has your best interests in
shippers do not realize that this surge of sales reps ismind?...probably, but not necessarily your balance
a clear indicator or excess shipping capacity and theirsheet or business growth interests. Think your
own inability to leverage the best cost/servicetransportation procurement department has a handle
transportation options for their companies.on cost containment or service optimization? They
The last 10 years have seen a huge increase insimply do not have the tools or leverage to change
non-asset/third party transportation companies.their current transportation procurement
Reflecting new technologies that can leveragemanagement processes. This is a senior leadership
transportation spend, best solutions in cost/transitopportunity, even priority, as otherwise
services and providing dedicated accounttransportation spend savings and sales growth
support...these new options elude asset providers asthrough increased value will not happen.
there is no capability for them to provide this kind ofManaging your supply chain effectively is no longer a
value proposition. Many shippers response to thesedepartmental function, but an integrated company
new options has been to align themselves with assetprocess. If transportation is not a core competency
based options and otherwise view change as afor you, why are you spending capital trying to
threat to their status quo and defend their actionsmanage? The best in class have learned to change
with anecdotal transportation horror stories.their transportation procurement paradigm, leveraging
Transportation is a $1.3 trillion dollar/yr industry. $500their spend and value needs by outsourcing this
billion of this is private fleets (a costly mistake forfunction, at no risk, no cost...just adding more value
most shippers), full truckload and full container. Theto grow and prosper.