| Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Supply chain financial management | | | | metric. Improvements in supply chain design and |
| Â | | | | operation may pay off in reduced inventory levels, |
| Supply chain management definition | | | | thereby improving this metric. Additionally, |
| - Â All facilities, functions, and activities associated | | | | modernpayment systems such as EIPP may pay off |
| with flow and transformation of goods and services | | | | in reductions in both A/R and A/P for companies |
| from raw materials to customer, as well as the | | | | along the supply chain. Here, the benefit would be in |
| associated information flows | | | | reduced Working Capital needs. |
| - An integrated group of processes to "source," | | | | Impact on Service |
| "make," and "deliver" products | | | | Expedited financial flows support a smooth-running |
| - The system of suppliers, manufacturers, | | | | supply chain. Conversely, if a delay in financial flows |
| transporters, distributors, and vendors that exists to | | | | causes delays in material receipt, then customer |
| transform raw materials to final products and supply | | | | service (fill rates, availability, on-time delivery) can be |
| those products to customers | | | | unexpectedly degraded. |
| Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â That portion of supply chain which | | | | Impact on Inventory |
| comes after the manufacturing process is sometimes | | | | Financial flow processes associated with A/R can also |
| known as the distribution network | | | | affect the supply chain. There may be instances |
| Types of supply chain | | | | where unexpected delays in cash receipts force a |
| Â Â 1. Physical supply chain | | | | company to delay ordering of incoming materials, due |
| Â Â 2. Financial supply chain | | | | to Working Capital constraints. This could result in |
| Physical supply chain refers to the movement of | | | | reduced customer service later on, when the |
| goods as was described earlier between the initial | | | | absence of the missing materials is felt; it could result |
| supplier to the ultimate customer. | | | | in higher stock outs, lower on-time deliveries, and |
| Financial supply chain refers to the movement of | | | | decreased revenues. |
| funds resulting from physical supply chain | | | | Improvement opportunity for finance flows |
| Integration of FSCN with physical supply chain | | | | Adopting automation solution for financial clows |
| Â Financial supply chain integrates with physical supply | | | | such as Purchase card and distribution card and EIPP |
| chain in multiple places with activities largely around | | | | systems creates improvement opportunities and cost |
| payments and loans. | | | | saving in several areas. |
| Generally banks provide these services some time | | | | Â |
| other agencies also provides | | | | More Efficient Purchase & Sales Processes |
| Â Goal of the SCM | | | | P-Cards have provided significant reductions in |
| Â Â Â Â Â Â SCM is concerned with the efficient | | | | purchasing processing costs. Studies show a 50 to 60 |
| integration of suppliers, factories, warehouses and | | | | percent reduction in A/P invoice processing from |
| stores so that merchandise is produced and | | | | electronic systems.6 Another advantage of P-Cards is |
| distributed. | | | | that they can be easily synchronized with |
| Â Â Â -In the right quantities | | | | companyexpenditure policies. Merchant Category |
| Â Â Â Â -to the right location | | | | Codes can be used to direct purchases to vendors |
| Â Â Â Â -at the right time | | | | on a company's Approved Vendor List (AVL). There |
| Â In order to | | | | may be dollarspending limits set on any single |
| Â Â Â Â Â -Minimize total system cost | | | | purchase, which can vary by individual. To improve |
| Â Â Â Â Â -Satisfy customer service requirements | | | | sales and collections processes a seller may receive |
| Need for financial supply chain management | | | | settlement of funds as soon as the next day by |
| Â Â Â Â Â Â Benchmarks of business performance | | | | accepting a P-Card and and/or a Distribution Card as |
| indicate that enterprise resource planning (ERP) | | | | a payment method. |
| systems and other enterprise technologies have | | | | Faster Reconciliation through Electronic |
| transformed customer and supply chain processes | | | | Invoice Presentment (EIP) and Payment (EIPP) |
| but that the performance of the finance function has | | | | Electronic Reconciliation – A/P |
| hardly changed. Although some companies have | | | | Matching shipping receipts, invoices, and |
| managed to improve the performance of their | | | | corresponding purchase orders has been a manual |
| financial processes profoundly, financial functions are | | | | process for A/P in many companies. It is not |
| still neglected in many businesses, and day's sales | | | | uncommon to have mismatch rates between 10 |
| outstanding (DSO) and working capital needs are | | | | percent and 25 percent of all invoices received. The |
| very high in several industries. The working | | | | buyer typically informsthe seller about the mismatch |
| capital scorecard for 2008 from CFO Magazine | | | | and may not make any partial payment on the |
| demonstrates that there are significant differences | | | | invoice until the discrepancy is resolved. It may seem |
| between high and low performers within an industry. | | | | that the buyer is gaining "fl oat"or the use of |
| In the automotive industry, for example, the best | | | | Working Capital until resolution occurs, but since the |
| score in DSO was 44, while the worst score was | | | | cause is a document mismatch, there is no way the |
| 241—five times more than the sector median of | | | | buyer can plan on that fl oat systematically. |
| 47. Research from the Hackett Group indicates that | | | | Furthermore, from a supply chain viewpoint, the |
| finance department costs continue to consume more | | | | uncertainty associated with the delay in invoice |
| than 1% of revenues in many companies, and CFOs | | | | payment until resolution may create difficulties for |
| struggle with poor transparency of their daily cash | | | | the seller. Electronic means of improving the |
| flows | | | | three-way matching process are emerging. |
| Â Â Â Â In times when unprecedented economic | | | | Companies that have movedin this direction will |
| uncertainty and soaring stockholder expectations are | | | | typically perform the three-way match much earlier in |
| putting every function under closer scrutiny than | | | | the process. It is no longer necessary to wait until |
| ever before, the finance function should be driving | | | | the invoice is due; the match can be performed |
| business, not holding it back. Financial supply chain | | | | immediately after the material has been received and |
| management (FSCM) can help companies to remove | | | | a count performed. (Quality checkscan be done in |
| some of the inefficiencies in operational processes in | | | | parallel.) If a discrepancy is found, then there is ample |
| order to become more effective. | | | | time to correct it without delaying payment beyond |
| Definitions of Financial Supply Chain Management | | | | normal terms, since the reconciliation has been |
| There are different definitions of the term financial | | | | initiated much earlier in the process. Furthermore, |
| supply chain , which appeared for the first time in | | | | modern EIPP systems can provide sufficient |
| 2000 and 2001. According to the research company | | | | invoice-level detail so that many mismatches can be |
| Killen & Associates (2001), the financial supply | | | | quickly diagnosed with the information provided |
| chain "parallels the physical or materials supply chain | | | | electronically. This speeds up the reconciliation |
| and represents all transaction activities related to the | | | | processsignificantly and accomplishes it at much lower |
| flow of cash from the customer's initial order through | | | | cost. Electronic Reconciliation – A/R |
| reconciliation and payment to the seller." The | | | | Â |
| Aberdeen Group, another research company, calls the | | | | Electronic Reconciliation – A/R |
| financial supply chain  "a range of B-to-B | | | |  |
| trade-related intra- and inter-company financial | | | | The same three-way match discussed above is also |
| transaction-based functions and processes [which] | | | | present on the A/R side. Companies can easily have |
| begin before buyers and suppliers establish contact | | | | three-way match discrepancies on the A/R side of |
| and proceed beyond the settlement process." The | | | | between 10 percent and 40 percent of invoices sent. |
| two definitions emphasize different topics. Killen's | | | | It may take up to 40 days to resolve the |
| focuses on the parallelism between the physical and | | | | discrepancies. The company may receive only a |
| the financial supply chain, and it stresses a section of | | | | partial payment on their invoice during this period, and |
| the cash flow collaborative nature of | | | | sometimes no payment at all, until the discrepancy is |
| financial supply chain management and reveals that | | | | resolved With automated systems, reconciliation can |
| the financial value chain isn't limited to the inner walls | | | | be accomplished earlier, more easily, and faster. |
| of a company but includes communication and | | | | Modern e-payment systems can include detailed |
| cooperation with business partners | | | | information such as P.O. number, Invoice number,and |
| Both definitions focus on a process-oriented view of | | | | sufficient invoice and P.O. line item details to resolve |
| the financial supply chain  that is basically correct; | | | | many mismatches without further manual effort. The |
| however, in many respects the explanations do not | | | | result is significantly faster cash inflows (e.g., a better |
| go far enough: | | | | Cash-to-Cash cycle) and reduced Days Sales |
| They focus very much on the collaboration between | | | | Outstanding (DSO). Furthermore, automated |
| companies—specifically, suppliers and | | | | A/R processing can improve customer relationships |
| customers—and they do not consider other | | | |  |
| important business partners within the financial supply | | | | Improved Flow of Information |
| chain, such as banks. | | | | Data Integration |
| They describe primarily the status quo, and do not | | | | Use of P-Cards allows companies to obtain detailed |
| stress the various dimensions for the optimization of | | | | data that is very helpful in the reconciliation process |
| business processes within the financial supply chain. | | | | and could also be useful in the product supply chain. |
| The motivation, as well as the key , for an efficient | | | | While all card transactions contain "Level One" |
| financial supply chain are not obvious. | | | | information (the minimum needed to clear and settle |
| Another definition that includes these three aspects is | | | | the financial transaction), modern systems allow for |
| the following: Financial supply chain | | | | "Level Two" and "Level Three" data capture and |
| management (FSCM) is the holistic and | | | | transaction reporting. In particular, Level Three |
| comprehensive planning and controlling of all financial | | | | datamay include invoice-level details such as discount |
| processes which are relevant within a company and | | | | amount, freight/ship amount, order date, account |
| for communication with other enterprises. The goal | | | | number, item commodity code, item description, |
| of FSCM is to increase the transparency and the level | | | | quantity, unit of measure, and unit cost. |
| of automation of business processes along the | | | | Vendor Web Portals |
| financial value chain. The purpose is to save | | | | A vendor Web portal allows vendors electronic |
| processing costs and reduce the working capital of | | | | access to a company's information records pertaining |
| the company. This definition doesn't consider where | | | | to their company, such as invoice status. Modern |
| the financial supply chain actually begins and ends, | | | | e-payment systems can contain sufficient detail to |
| because there are also analytical processes that are | | | | allow many vendor inquiries to be handled by a self |
| not directly related to a business process but which | | | | service vendor portal. This saves both buyer and |
| belong nonetheless to the financial supply chain | | | | seller time and expense; it reduces telephone calls to |
| Â | | | | the buyer and provides a faster response to the |
| Key Performance Indicators | | | | seller. |
| Â | | | | Outsourcing Credit and Collections |
| There are various key performance indicators that | | | | Credit Limit Optimization |
| are relevant for measurement in financial supply chain | | | | When setting appropriate credit limits for customers, |
| management. One key metric is the cash | | | | a number of different factors come into play, |
| flow cycle, which defines the period from delivery | | | | including account profitability and credit risk. Monitoring |
| by suppliers until the cash collection of receivables | | | | credit limits dynamically is difficult for companies to |
| from customers (Figure 1). It is the time period | | | | accomplish by themselves. There are |
| required for the company to receive the invested | | | | economicefficiencies in outsourcing the task of |
| funds back in the form of cash. The cash | | | | determining optimal credit limits and monitoring them |
| flow cycle can be divided into the operating | | | | dynamically. Not many companies can claim their core |
| cycle—which is the time period between delivery | | | | competence is optimizing credit limits. This business |
| by suppliers and the actual cash collection of | | | | function is a natural candidate for outsourcing to a |
| receivables, and the cash flow cycle—which is | | | | financial institution. Such institutions have specialized |
| the time period between the cash payment for | | | | staff to deal with assessment of credit risk, as well |
| inventory and the cash collection of receivables. The | | | | as standardized collection procedures. Due to |
| longer the cash flow cycle, the greater is the | | | | economies of scale, they may be able to provide this |
| working capital requirement of a company, which | | | | function in a more cost-effective manner. |
| means that a reduction of the cash flow cycle will | | | | Receivables Financing |
| immediately free up liquidity  | | | | If a company or an industry has traditionally had |
| Within the cash flow cycle we can differentiate the | | | | lengthy payment terms (e.g., 90 days or more), the |
| following parameters, | | | | suppliers will often want to have their receivables |
| - Days in inventory: This is the length of time | | | | financed. This is another opportunity for banks to |
| between the delivery of the goods and the invoice | | | | provide value. |
| from the supplier, and the sale of the goods and the | | | | Collections |
| invoice to the customer. It describes the average | | | | Companies are also using Distribution Card solutions |
| number of days the goods of a company remain in | | | | to streamline their collections and reconciliation |
| inventory before being sold. This metric is the focus | | | | tasks.Selling can be more effective when banks |
| for all activities around classical supply chain | | | | manage collections duties. |
| management | | | | Lower Working Capital Needs |
| - Days in payables: This is the length of time | | | | Improved financial flow processing can contribute to |
| between delivery of the goods and the invoice from | | | | reduced Working Capital through better visibility. More |
| the supplier, and the actual payment for the | | | | effective financial processing can help remove |
| inventory. This figure describes the average time it | | | | uncertainties in  financial flows and thereby |
| takes to pay a supplier. The parameter considers the | | | | contribute to a significant decrease in the Days of |
| outstanding receivables of a company, and is an | | | | Working Capital (DWC). It has been estimated that |
| important metric for debtors concentrating on their | | | | increased visibility into A/R can reduce working |
| efforts to optimize the purchase-to-pay cycle. | | | | Capital needs by as much as 20-25 percent.7 One |
| - Days sales outstanding: This is the length of time | | | | way to estimate the impact of better visibility is to |
| between the sale of the goods and the invoice to | | | | draw a parallel between managing Working Capital |
| the customer, and the actual payment date of the | | | | and managing inventories. Safety stock in inventory |
| customer. This metric measures the average number | | | | systems is proportional to the standard deviation of |
| of days companies need to collect revenue after a | | | | the demand forecast error. Improvements in supply |
| sale has been made. A high DSO number means that | | | | chains can often lower the effective standard |
| an enterprise is selling to its customers on credit and | | | | deviation of forecast error by 10-20 percent. Applying |
| taking longer to collect money. The figure is an | | | | this logic to Working Capital, one would expect that |
| important figure for creditors, to optimize the | | | | improved visibility on both A/P and A/R could |
| order-to-cash cycle | | | | translate to reductions of 10-20 percent. One industry |
| - Days in receivables: This is the length of time | | | | source forecasts that sophisticated cash-flow |
| between the sale of the goods and the invoice to | | | | optimization tools will appear by 2006-07, adding |
| the customer, and the expected payment date. This | | | | significant enhancements to current innovative |
| key p performance indicator is similar to DSO, and | | | | payment capabilities |
| indicates the average time, in days, that receivables | | | | Strengthened Partner Relationships |
| are outstanding. Days in receivables can also be called | | | | Closer, Responsive Customer Connection |
| best possible DSO, since the company would collect | | | | Automated systems to submit invoices and receive |
| all receivables before the due date | | | | payments make it easier for customers to reconcile |
| Within the cash flow cycle there is potential to | | | | and pay invoices. The ability to send Advance |
| reduce both days in inventory and days sales | | | | Shipping Notices (ASNs) and to track customer |
| outstanding. Days in payables can be increased but | | | | orders (dynamic order status information) can further |
| should be monitored carefully to avoid putting | | | | cement the relationship between a company and its |
| supplies at risk. Days in receivables can be reduced | | | | customers. Differentiate by Adding Services (e.g., |
| by optimizing cash collection. Another important | | | | EIPP) When a company provides a product that is |
| indicator for an efficient financial supply chain | | | | not easily differentiated (e.g., a commodity), it can |
| management is working capital, which is a balance | | | | use financial services to differentiate itself from |
| sheet  metric and part of the liquid assets. working | | | | competitors. If acompany uses EIPP, it is much easier |
| capital is calculated as current assets less | | | | for customers to do business with that company |
| current | | | | because EIPP benefits accrue to both parties in the |
| liabilitites, and is | | | | supply chain. If a buyer is considering two alternative |
| a measure of the liquid reserve and short-term | | | | sources of product, the company offering the EIPP |
| solvency of an enterprise, available to satisfy | | | | benefi ts could be in a better position to win the |
| contingencies and uncertainties. One of the key | | | | business. |
| objectives of financial supply chain management is to | | | | What's Happening in |
| optimize the working capital by reducing, for instance, | | | | Financial Flow Management |
| outstanding receivables. | | | | Several trends and best practices are emerging for |
| Supply Chain Flows | | | | financial flows that will help to streamline and create |
| A supply chain is a network of partners that | | | | end-to-end electronic payments. These include: |
| produces raw materials, subassemblies, and finished | | | | Purchasing Cards and Distribution Cards |
| products, then distributes them via various sales | | | | More and more companies are installing Purchasing |
| channels to customers. | | | | Cards (P-Cards) as a way of making purchasing more |
| Along this chain, there are three major flows:material, | | | | efficient and cost-effective. P-Card systems also |
| information, and financial | | | | enable companies to aggregate spend data quickly |
| Financial Flows in the Supply Chain | | | | and frequently, and to maintain compliance with |
| Invoices and Payments | | | | company spend policies They also increase financial |
| The financial flow in a typical supply chain includes | | | | transparency and help companies adhere to |
| thousands of invoices and payments in a given year. | | | | regulations. The Distribution Card is designed to |
| The scale of this problem is challenging corporations | | | | re-engineer Distributors' and wholesalers' accounts |
| to find ways of streamlining their processing. There | | | | receivable (A/R) process through the replacement of |
| are also considerable savings to be obtained in other | | | | cash, customer credit and promissory notes. By |
| categories besides processing improvements. Any | | | | shifting the manual-driven process and burden of |
| single organization in the supply chain has both | | | | invoicing and collections from the Distributor to the |
| Accounts Payable (A/P) and Accounts Receivable (A | | | | Bank, the Distribution Card transforms the collection |
| R) activities. Each invoice is an A/P from the | | | | process into a quick paperless electronic payment, |
| downstream buyer's perspective and an A/R from | | | | reducing accounts receivable (A/R) costs substantially. |
| the upstream seller's viewpoint. Multiple invoices, | | | | Sales proceeds can be immediately transferred into |
| however, are often paid by a single payment. This | | | | working capital for faster turnover. |
| requires information as to which specific invoices are | | | | EIPP (Electronic Invoice |
| covered by a remittance. Also, when invoices are | | | | Presentment & Payment) |
| reconciled prior to payment, the three-way match of | | | | Gradually, companies are moving toward Electronic |
| purchase order (P.O.), shipping receipt, and invoice | | | | Invoice Presentment (EIP) and Electronic Invoice |
| may fail if all documents are not precisely consistent. | | | | Presentment and Payment (EIPP). In a recent survey, |
| Both of these potential failures can often be dealt | | | | 78 percent of respondents said they were either |
| with by innovative payment solutions with | | | | "very likely" or "somewhat likely" to transition from |
| pre-established tolerances for automated processing | | | | paper checks to electronic payments for their B2B |
| Information Transfer | | | | payments within the next three years.2 Today's new |
| Â | | | | EIPP tools provide an excellent opportunity to |
| Financial flows also include information transfer via  | | | | perform financial flow and information flow tasks at |
| Electronic Invoice Presentment (EIP) and electronic | | | | the same time. The ability to send detailed |
| payments. This combination constitutes the Electronic | | | | invoice-level information (SKU numbers, quantities, PO |
| Invoice Presentment and Payment (EIPP), an | | | | numbers, etc.) along with remittances enables the |
| advanced payment application that automates | | | | supply chain to transfer this information quickly and |
| specific financial tasks, as well as provides the | | | | without errors often found inmanual procedures. |
| opportunity to collect, aggregate, and share valuable | | | | Invoice Imaging |
| information across the supply chain. Until recently, | | | | Some companies are creating soft copy images of |
| information and  financial flows were treated | | | | paper invoices so that all payments can proceed |
| separately. However, innovative payment solutions | | | | along an electronic, paperless pathway. Others are |
| can now include detailed transaction information such | | | | creating data warehouses to maintain line item detail, |
| as date and time of receipt, supplier name, quantity | | | | with information from a P-Card solution or other |
| received, P.O. number, etc. Having both financial and | | | | sources. |
| detailed product information available electronically can | | | | Supplier Web Portals for Invoice Inquiries |
| minimize human errors, reduce reconciliation time, and | | | | Another signifi cant trend is to develop Web-based |
| create a more tightly integrated supply chain. | | | | automated inquiry systems for suppliers. Instead of |
| Importantly, banks can aid customers in ensuring that | | | | accessing a call center to make a simple inquiry, |
| reconciliation and posting to General Ledger (GL) is | | | | suppliers can access a Web portal for their company |
| integrated automatically | | | | and perform self-service inquiry regarding the |
| Supply Chain Management Challenges | | | | statusof their invoices (received, in payables queue, in |
| Despite the fact that companies have made a large | | | | reconciliation queue, scheduled to be paid as of a |
| number of significant supply chain management | | | | certain date, etc.). |
| improvements over the past decade, there are still | | | | Â |
| some unique challenges affecting operational | | | | Web-based Financial Reporting |
| efficiencies and service. The challenges listed here are | | | | To reduce costs, significantly improve spend |
| those most closely related to what is commonly | | | | management, and make more informed business |
| known as the "bullwhip effect," a term that refers to | | | | decisions, many companies are finding that it's critical |
| amplifications of end-consumer demand as one | | | | to electronically capture financial transaction and |
| moves up the supply chain. How a company mitigates | | | | invoice-level data and then review it through a |
| the bullwhip effect depends on the cause | | | | Web-based reporting tool. This transaction and |
| CHALLENGE: Information Distortion | | | | invoice-level data may be easily integrated |
| SOLUTION: Ensure rapid information exchange along | | | | withexisting back office financial systems. Research |
| the chain | | | | indicates that this integration capability can save 1-4 |
| One cause of the Bullwhip Effect deals with | | | | days per month on manual data synthesis and |
| information distortion. If consumer sales  increase by | | | | reconciliation activities          |
| 5 percent in a given week, a retailer could end up | | | | KPIs for Supply Chains |
| ordering 7 percent more product in response to the | | | | Product Supply Chain metrics have three key |
| increase and a feeling that demand will continue. The | | | | dimensions: |
| next link in the chain, observing what appears to be a | | | | • Customer service is usually measured by |
| 7 percent increase in demand, then orders a larger | | | | percent Fill Rate or percent Complete Order Rate in a |
| increase on his supplier. Eventually the factory may | | | | build-to stock situation, or by percent On-time |
| observe an inflated 20 percent increase in orders | | | | Delivery in a build-to-order case. Increasingly for |
| Delays in transmitting changes regarding demand or | | | | build-to-stock situations, companies are also |
| supply can amplify problems. A good way to deal | | | | measuring Product |
| with this situation is to share point-of-sales (POS) | | | | Availability (percent time in stock) at retailers' shelves |
| informationwith all partners in the chain. Emerging | | | | as a metric for customer service. |
| electronic payment (e.g. card-based solutions) and | | | | • Inventory (an Asset) is measured by value, by |
| information management tools provide a new way of | | | | time supply (Days of Inventory), or by Inventory |
| sharing information. | | | | Turns (Turns = Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) |
| Â | | | | Inventory Value). All three metrics are closely related. |
| SOLUTION: Vendor-Managed Inventory (VMI) | | | | By knowing a firm's annual COGS, one can derive |
| Another way to deal with information distortion | | | | anyinventory metric from either of the others. |
| involves giving the supplier "decision rights" regarding | | | | • Speed is often measured by the Cash-to-Cash |
| the timing and quantity of replenishments. While | | | | (C2C) cycle (C2C = Inventory + A/R – A/P), all |
| many buyers may have concerns about turning these | | | | measured in days of supply. |
| decisions over to suppliers, there have been | | | | A negative C2C cycle is attractive for growth. |
| numeroussuccessful pilots and full-scale applications of | | | | However, taking the entire supply chain perspective, |
| this concept, called Vendor-Managed Inventory (VMI). | | | | one's suppliers presumably become accustomed to |
| CHALLENGE: Miscommunication | | | | delayed payment terms and find other ways to |
| SOLUTION: Collaboration and Integration | | | | manage profitability. Furthermore, one company's |
| Companies along the supply chain are more | | | | payables are another company's receivables, and in |
| collaborative compared to the past. They are sharing | | | | the supply chain view, these "cancel out" with |
| forecasts and attempting to operate in a highly | | | | oneanother. However, the integration of automated |
| integrated fashion so that the end customer | | | | payment solutions can lead to a significant reduction |
| perceives the entire supply chain as fully integrated. | | | | in the uncertainty of A/P and A/R flows, which can |
| Collaboration can takeseveral forms. A simple sharing | | | | ultimately be quite valuable to the entire chain |
| of forecasts between supply chain partners can | | | | Â |
| often avoid miscommunication about special | | | | KPIs for Financial Flows |
| promotions or other events that will affect demand. | | | | Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for financial flows |
| More complex integration can take the form of VMI | | | | include the following: |
| Information Transfer | | | | • Days of Working Capital (DWC) = |
| Â | | | | (Working Capital/Annual Revenue) x 365 |
| Financial flows also include information transfer via  | | | | • Days Sales Outstanding (DSO) = |
| Electronic Invoice Presentment (EIP) and electronic | | | | (Accounts Receivable/Annual Revenue) x 365 |
| payments. This combination constitutes the Electronic | | | | • Days of Inventory (DIO) = |
| Invoice Presentment and Payment (EIPP), an | | | | (Inventory Value/COGS) x 365 |
| advanced payment application that automates | | | | • Days Payables Outstanding (DPO) = |
| specific financial tasks, as well as provides the | | | | (Accounts Payable/Annual Revenue) x 365 |
| opportunity to collect, aggregate, and share valuable | | | | Days of Working Capital can be easily converted into |
| information across the supply chain. Until recently, | | | | an equivalent metric, Working Capital as percent of |
| information and  financial flows were treated | | | | Annual Sales. (For example, if a company's DWC is 50 |
| separately. However, innovative payment solutions | | | | days, then Working Capital as a percent of Annual |
| can now include detailed transaction information such | | | | Sales = 50/365 = 13.7 percent.) |
| as date and time of receipt, supplier name, quantity | | | | Other important characteristics of financial flows are: |
| received, P.O. number, etc. Having both financial and | | | | • Reliability of payment methods |
| detailed product information available electronically can | | | | • Predictability of payment inflows and |
| minimize human errors, reduce reconciliation time, and | | | | outflows;improving cash flow |
| create a more tightly integrated supply chain. | | | | • Information Management (invoice-level data |
| Importantly, banks can aid customers in ensuring that | | | | withfinancial data) |
| reconciliation and posting to General Ledger (GL) is | | | | Key How Supply Chain & Financial Flow KPIs |
| integrated automatically | | | | Connect for Greater Efficiencies |
| Financial Flow Management Challenges | | | | In many cases, financial flow KPIs can have a direct, |
| Â | | | | positive impact on supply chain management |
| Most companies require significant amounts of | | | | performance. |
| Working Capital to deal with variable and somewhat | | | | Impact on C2C |
| unpredictable financial inflows and outflows. When | | | | The financial flow KPIs of DIO, DSO, and DPO have |
| viewed collectively, the financial flow management | | | | a direct correlation to the C2C cycle supply chain |
| challenges such as slow processing, unreliable and | | | | metric. Improvements in supply chain design and |
| unpredictable cash flows, costly processes, high Days | | | | operation may pay off in reduced inventory levels, |
| Sales Outstanding (DSO), and suboptimal credit | | | | thereby improving this metric. Additionally, |
| decisions require higher Working Capital than | | | | modernpayment systems such as EIPP may pay off |
| necessary. | | | | in reductions in both A/R and A/P for companies |
| If these challenges were removed, the money saved | | | | along the supply chain. Here, the benefit would be in |
| could be shifted to more valuable uses. In order to | | | | reduced Working Capital needs. |
| strategically address and minimize financial flow | | | | Impact on Service |
| challenges and take appropriate action, one must first | | | | Expedited financial flows support a smooth-running |
| identify and evaluate the common causes. | | | | supply chain. Conversely, if a delay in financial flows |
| Â | | | | causes delays in material receipt, then customer |
| Â | | | | service (fill rates, availability, on-time delivery) can be |
| Manual Processes | | | | unexpectedly degraded. |
| Manual processes tend to be slow, unreliable, | | | | Impact on Inventory |
| unpredictable, and in the final analysis, often more | | | | Financial flow processes associated with A/R can also |
| costly than automated solutions. | | | | affect the supply chain. There may be instances |
| Lack of Timely Information | | | | where unexpected delays in cash receipts force a |
| In many situations, financial flows do not contain | | | | company to delay ordering of incoming materials, due |
| sufficient detailed information for either manual or | | | | to Working Capital constraints. This could result in |
| automated systems to accomplish their jobs. As a | | | | reduced customer service later on, when the |
| result, additional time and effort is required to obtain | | | | absence of the missing materials is felt; it could result |
| missing information (e.g., invoice-level | | | | in higher stock outs, lower on-time deliveries, and |
| detailedinformation such as SKU numbers, item | | | | decreased revenues. |
| quantities, and P.O. numbers). | | | | Â |
| Lack of Employee Empowerment and | | | | Improvement opportunity for finance flows |
| Spend Policy Compliance | | | | Adopting automation solution for financial clows |
| If purchasing by individuals isn't carefully monitored | | | | such as Purchase card and distribution card and EIPP |
| and controlled, inappropriate spending may occur, | | | | systems creates improvement opportunities and cost |
| undermining the company's initiatives to control | | | | saving in several areas. |
| expenses and improve strategic sourcing. Strategic | | | | Â |
| sourcing requires companies to know how much they | | | | More Efficient Purchase & Sales Processes |
| are purchasing from various suppliers for different | | | | P-Cards have provided significant reductions in |
| categories of product. Performing periodic analyses to | | | | purchasing processing costs. Studies show a 50 to 60 |
| create reports to help monitor spending and | | | | percent reduction in A/P invoice processing from |
| negotiate strategic sourcing with key vendors may | | | | electronic systems.6 Another advantage of P-Cards is |
| be time-consuming and costly if this data is not | | | | that they can be easily synchronized with |
| captured electronically. | | | | companyexpenditure policies. Merchant Category |
| Delays in Invoice Reconciliation | | | | Codes can be used to direct purchases to vendors |
| Delays in invoice reconciliation are a particular cause | | | | on a company's Approved Vendor List (AVL). There |
| of additional Working Capital; they delay receipt of | | | | may be dollarspending limits set on any single |
| payments and increase Days Sales Outstanding | | | | purchase, which can vary by individual. To improve |
| (DSO) of receivables. When there is a three-way | | | | sales and collections processes a seller may receive |
| mismatch of invoice, P.O., and shipping receipt, there | | | | settlement of funds as soon as the next day by |
| is an inevitable delay while the mismatch is | | | | accepting a P-Card and and/or a Distribution Card as |
| investigated. These investigations typically take time, | | | | a payment method. |
| as well as add cost. | | | | Faster Reconciliation through Electronic |
| Processes for Setting Optimal Limits | | | | Invoice Presentment (EIP) and Payment (EIPP) |
| Companies often maintain their own departments to | | | | Electronic Reconciliation – A/P |
| set customer credit limits. However, the ability to set | | | | Matching shipping receipts, invoices, and |
| optimal credit limits may require sophisticated | | | | corresponding purchase orders has been a manual |
| algorithms that are often inaccessible to non-financial | | | | process for A/P in many companies. It is not |
| companies. | | | | uncommon to have mismatch rates between 10 |
| What's happening in | | | | percent and 25 percent of all invoices received. The |
| Supply Chain Management | | | | buyer typically informsthe seller about the mismatch |
| Several trends and innovative best practices in supply | | | | and may not make any partial payment on the |
| chain management are now being observed in | | | | invoice until the discrepancy is resolved. It may seem |
| forward-looking companies. These include | | | | that the buyer is gaining "fl oat"or the use of |
| Shared Services, Group Procurement | | | | Working Capital until resolution occurs, but since the |
| Companies that formerly had independent purchasing | | | | cause is a document mismatch, there is no way the |
| and payment operations at multiple sites are moving | | | | buyer can plan on that fl oat systematically. |
| to a "shared services" model that centralizes these | | | | Furthermore, from a supply chain viewpoint, the |
| functions. The major benefits of shared services | | | | uncertainty associated with the delay in invoice |
| include economies of scale and increased quantity | | | | payment until resolution may create difficulties for |
| discounts from suppliers. availability on the store shelf | | | | the seller. Electronic means of improving the |
| for the end consumer They may also measure their | | | | three-way matching process are emerging. |
| average response time to special orders, as well as | | | | Companies that have movedin this direction will |
| their worst-case response time. | | | | typically perform the three-way match much earlier in |
| Supplier Web Portals for Inventory Data | | | | the process. It is no longer necessary to wait until |
| Many companies are instituting Web portals where | | | | the invoice is due; the match can be performed |
| suppliers can view inventory levels at the customer's | | | | immediately after the material has been received and |
| site and POS or consumption data on materials. In | | | | a count performed. (Quality checkscan be done in |
| order to implement Vendor-Managed Inventory | | | | parallel.) If a discrepancy is found, then there is ample |
| (VMI), it is necessary that the supplier gain access | | | | time to correct it without delaying payment beyond |
| tothe customer's inventory and consumption data. | | | | normal terms, since the reconciliation has been |
| Such portals can also contain status information | | | | initiated much earlier in the process. Furthermore, |
| regarding the supplier's invoices. | | | | modern EIPP systems can provide sufficient |
| Sophisticated Supply Chain Planning Systems | | | | invoice-level detail so that many mismatches can be |
| Modern supply chains have multiple levels, and it is | | | | quickly diagnosed with the information provided |
| often inefficient to manage each level independently. | | | | electronically. This speeds up the reconciliation |
| Various companies have installed sophisticated supply | | | | processsignificantly and accomplishes it at much lower |
| chain planning systems to replace separate layers of | | | | cost. Electronic Reconciliation – A/R |
| independent decisions. | | | | Â |
| Extended Performance Measures | | | | Electronic Reconciliation – A/R |
| Progressive companies today work as part of an | | | | Â |
| integrated supply chain and measure product | | | | The same three-way match discussed above is also |
| Collaboration Along the Chain; VMI | | | | present on the A/R side. Companies can easily have |
| Leading companies are working closely with partners | | | | three-way match discrepancies on the A/R side of |
| along their supply chain to try to implement VMI. The | | | | between 10 percent and 40 percent of invoices sent. |
| evidence speaks loud and clear that VMI generally | | | | It may take up to 40 days to resolve the |
| lowers inventories across the supply chain, increases | | | | discrepancies. The company may receive only a |
| higher product availability, and improves revenues. | | | | partial payment on their invoice during this period, and |
| Expanded Service Offerings | | | | sometimes no payment at all, until the discrepancy is |
| Often, a company may be asked to perform a new | | | | resolved With automated systems, reconciliation can |
| service by one of its customers. Enlightened | | | | be accomplished earlier, more easily, and faster. |
| companies are studying such opportunities to | | | | Modern e-payment systems can include detailed |
| determine if theywill lead to improved profitability. If | | | | information such as P.O. number, Invoice number,and |
| so, they may decide to offer the expanded service | | | | sufficient invoice and P.O. line item details to resolve |
| to all of their customers, thereby increasing | | | | many mismatches without further manual effort. The |
| profitability and also providing a closer attachment | | | | result is significantly faster cash inflows (e.g., a better |
| with current customers | | | | Cash-to-Cash cycle) and reduced Days Sales |
| Â | | | | Outstanding (DSO). Furthermore, automated |
| What's Happening in financial cial Flow Management | | | | A/R processing can improve customer relationships |
| Several trends and best practices are emerging for | | | | Â |
| financial flows that will help to streamline and create | | | | Improved Flow of Information |
| end-to-end electronic payments. These include: | | | | Data Integration |
| Purchasing Cards and Distribution Cards | | | | Use of P-Cards allows companies to obtain detailed |
| More and more companies are installing Purchasing | | | | data that is very helpful in the reconciliation process |
| Cards (P-Cards) as a way of making purchasing more | | | | and could also be useful in the product supply chain. |
| efficient and cost-effective. P-Card systems also | | | | While all card transactions contain "Level One" |
| enable companies to aggregate spend data quickly | | | | information (the minimum needed to clear and settle |
| and frequently, and to maintain compliance with | | | | the financial transaction), modern systems allow for |
| company spend policies They also increase financial | | | | "Level Two" and "Level Three" data capture and |
| transparency and help companies adhere to | | | | transaction reporting. In particular, Level Three |
| regulations. The Distribution Card is designed to | | | | datamay include invoice-level details such as discount |
| re-engineer Distributors' and wholesalers' accounts | | | | amount, freight/ship amount, order date, account |
| receivable (A/R) process through the replacement of | | | | number, item commodity code, item description, |
| cash, customer credit and promissory notes. By | | | | quantity, unit of measure, and unit cost. |
| shifting the manual-driven process and burden of | | | | Vendor Web Portals |
| invoicing and collections from the Distributor to the | | | | A vendor Web portal allows vendors electronic |
| Bank, the Distribution Card transforms the collection | | | | access to a company's information records pertaining |
| process into a quick paperless electronic payment, | | | | to their company, such as invoice status. Modern |
| reducing accounts receivable (A/R) costs substantially. | | | | e-payment systems can contain sufficient detail to |
| Sales proceeds can be immediately transferred into | | | | allow many vendor inquiries to be handled by a self |
| working capital for faster turnover. | | | | service vendor portal. This saves both buyer and |
| EIPP (Electronic Invoice | | | | seller time and expense; it reduces telephone calls to |
| Presentment & Payment) | | | | the buyer and provides a faster response to the |
| Gradually, companies are moving toward Electronic | | | | seller. |
| Invoice Presentment (EIP) and Electronic Invoice | | | | Outsourcing Credit and Collections |
| Presentment and Payment (EIPP). In a recent survey, | | | | Credit Limit Optimization |
| 78 percent of respondents said they were either | | | | When setting appropriate credit limits for customers, |
| "very likely" or "somewhat likely" to transition from | | | | a number of different factors come into play, |
| paper checks to electronic payments for their B2B | | | | including account profitability and credit risk. Monitoring |
| payments within the next three years.2 Today's new | | | | credit limits dynamically is difficult for companies to |
| EIPP tools provide an excellent opportunity to | | | | accomplish by themselves. There are |
| perform financial flow and information flow tasks at | | | | economicefficiencies in outsourcing the task of |
| the same time. The ability to send detailed | | | | determining optimal credit limits and monitoring them |
| invoice-level information (SKU numbers, quantities, PO | | | | dynamically. Not many companies can claim their core |
| numbers, etc.) along with remittances enables the | | | | competence is optimizing credit limits. This business |
| supply chain to transfer this information quickly and | | | | function is a natural candidate for outsourcing to a |
| without errors often found inmanual procedures. | | | | financial institution. Such institutions have specialized |
| Invoice Imaging | | | | staff to deal with assessment of credit risk, as well |
| Some companies are creating soft copy images of | | | | as standardized collection procedures. Due to |
| paper invoices so that all payments can proceed | | | | economies of scale, they may be able to provide this |
| along an electronic, paperless pathway. Others are | | | | function in a more cost-effective manner. |
| creating data warehouses to maintain line item detail, | | | | Receivables Financing |
| with information from a P-Card solution or other | | | | If a company or an industry has traditionally had |
| sources. | | | | lengthy payment terms (e.g., 90 days or more), the |
| Supplier Web Portals for Invoice Inquiries | | | | suppliers will often want to have their receivables |
| Another signifi cant trend is to develop Web-based | | | | financed. This is another opportunity for banks to |
| automated inquiry systems for suppliers. Instead of | | | | provide value. |
| accessing a call center to make a simple inquiry, | | | | Collections |
| suppliers can access a Web portal for their company | | | | Companies are also using Distribution Card solutions |
| and perform self-service inquiry regarding the | | | | to streamline their collections and reconciliation |
| statusof their invoices (received, in payables queue, in | | | | tasks.Selling can be more effective when banks |
| reconciliation queue, scheduled to be paid as of a | | | | manage collections duties. |
| certain date, etc.). | | | | Lower Working Capital Needs |
| Web-based Financial Reporting | | | | Improved financial flow processing can contribute to |
| To reduce costs, significantly improve spend | | | | reduced Working Capital through better visibility. More |
| management, and make more informed business | | | | effective financial processing can help remove |
| decisions, many companies are finding that it's critical | | | | uncertainties in  financial flows and thereby |
| to electronically capture financial transaction and | | | | contribute to a significant decrease in the Days of |
| invoice-level data and then review it through a | | | | Working Capital (DWC). It has been estimated that |
| Web-based reporting tool. This transaction and | | | | increased visibility into A/R can reduce working |
| invoice-level data may be easily integrated | | | | Capital needs by as much as 20-25 percent.7 One |
| withexisting back office financial systems. Research | | | | way to estimate the impact of better visibility is to |
| indicates that this integration capability can save 1-4 | | | | draw a parallel between managing Working Capital |
| days per month on manual data synthesis and | | | | and managing inventories. Safety stock in inventory |
| reconciliation activities          | | | | systems is proportional to the standard deviation of |
| KPIs for Supply Chains | | | | the demand forecast error. Improvements in supply |
| Product Supply Chain metrics have three key | | | | chains can often lower the effective standard |
| dimensions: | | | | deviation of forecast error by 10-20 percent. Applying |
| • Customer service is usually measured by | | | | this logic to Working Capital, one would expect that |
| percent Fill Rate or percent Complete Order Rate in a | | | | improved visibility on both A/P and A/R could |
| build-to stock situation, or by percent On-time | | | | translate to reductions of 10-20 percent. One industry |
| Delivery in a build-to-order case. Increasingly for | | | | source forecasts that sophisticated cash-flow |
| build-to-stock situations, companies are also | | | | optimization tools will appear by 2006-07, adding |
| measuring Product | | | | significant enhancements to current innovative |
| Availability (percent time in stock) at retailers' shelves | | | | payment capabilities |
| as a metric for customer service. | | | | Strengthened Partner Relationships |
| • Inventory (an Asset) is measured by value, by | | | | Closer, Responsive Customer Connection |
| time supply (Days of Inventory), or by Inventory | | | | Automated systems to submit invoices and receive |
| Turns (Turns = Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) | | | | payments make it easier for customers to reconcile |
| Inventory Value). All three metrics are closely related. | | | | and pay invoices. The ability to send Advance |
| By knowing a firm's annual COGS, one can derive | | | | Shipping Notices (ASNs) and to track customer |
| anyinventory metric from either of the others. | | | | orders (dynamic order status information) can further |
| • Speed is often measured by the Cash-to-Cash | | | | cement the relationship between a company and its |
| (C2C) cycle (C2C = Inventory + A/R – A/P), all | | | | customers. Differentiate by Adding Services (e.g., |
| measured in days of supply. | | | | EIPP) When a company provides a product that is |
| A negative C2C cycle is attractive for growth. | | | | not easily differentiated (e.g., a commodity), it can |
| However, taking the entire supply chain perspective, | | | | use financial services to differentiate itself from |
| one's suppliers presumably become accustomed to | | | | competitors. If acompany uses EIPP, it is much easier |
| delayed payment terms and find other ways to | | | | for customers to do business with that company |
| manage profitability. Furthermore, one company's | | | | because EIPP benefits accrue to both parties in the |
| payables are another company's receivables, and in | | | | supply chain. If a buyer is considering two alternative |
| the supply chain view, these "cancel out" with | | | | sources of product, the company offering the EIPP |
| oneanother. However, the integration of automated | | | | benefi ts could be in a better position to win the |
| payment solutions can lead to a significant reduction | | | | business. |
| in the uncertainty of A/P and A/R flows, which can | | | | Conclusions |
| ultimately be quite valuable to the entire chain | | | | The supply chain financial flow is at a critical threshold |
| Â | | | | of evolution. Current trends in supply chain and |
| KPIs for Financial Flows | | | | financial flow management clearly favor the use of |
| Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for financial flows | | | | automated payment solutions. Continued expansion in |
| include the following: | | | | this area offers high potential for: |
| • Days of Working Capital (DWC) = | | | | • Reducing significantly purchasing processing |
| (Working Capital/Annual Revenue) x 365 | | | | costs • Accelerating payment and invoice |
| • Days Sales Outstanding (DSO) = | | | | reconciliation • Reducing collections costs |
| (Accounts Receivable/Annual Revenue) x 365 | | | | significantly and minimizing the number Days Sales |
| • Days of Inventory (DIO) = | | | | Outstanding (DSO) |
| (Inventory Value/COGS) x 365 | | | | • Creating greater processing efficiencies in the |
| • Days Payables Outstanding (DPO) = | | | | procurement of goods |
| (Accounts Payable/Annual Revenue) x 365 | | | | • Enhancing visibility, which means less uncertainty |
| Days of Working Capital can be easily converted into | | | | in accounts receivable (A/R) and accounts payable (A |
| an equivalent metric, Working Capital as percent of | | | | P) and a reduction in Working Capital needs |
| Annual Sales. (For example, if a company's DWC is 50 | | | | Â |
| days, then Working Capital as a percent of Annual | | | | The various payment solutions presented in this |
| Sales = 50/365 = 13.7 percent.) | | | | document offer companies a powerful automated |
| Other important characteristics of financial flows are: | | | | system that can eliminate financial flow challenges in |
| • Reliability of payment methods | | | | today's supply chain. Based on an analysis of available |
| • Predictability of payment inflows and | | | | supply chain performance data and measures of |
| outflows;improving cash flow | | | | impact (as defined in this Visa Commercial Solutions |
| • Information Management (invoice-level data | | | | Industry Briefing), it is possible to draw some |
| withfinancial data) | | | | generalizations about the economic efficiencies and |
| Key How Supply Chain & Financial Flow KPIs | | | | benefits that can be gained by improving financial |
| Connect for Greater Efficiencies | | | | flows with various innovative payment solutions. |
| In many cases, financial flow KPIs can have a direct, | | | | Quantitatively speaking, a company with $1 billion |
| positive impact on supply chain management | | | | annual revenue could obtain an annual savings of |
| performance. | | | | nearly $10 million, or almost one percent of |
| Impact on C2C | | | | revenues.10 This projected savings represents |
| The financial flow KPIs of DIO, DSO, and DPO have | | | | more than 20 percent of typical annual profits for |
| a direct correlation to the C2C cycle supply chain | | | | such a company. |