IT Resource Planning

The new buzz word for companies looking to theThis siloed approach has traditionally meant that IT
futureshops have spent too much time trying to pull
An oft-heard mantra these days is aligning IT withinformation together from disparate systems to try
the business. Many IT departments are struggling toand gain consistent visibility across the different
evaluate how well they service their customers'processes making up IT.
needs or even to demonstrate what value theyBut because there are no end-to-end application
provide.suites such as ERP available at the moment to help
To make matters worse, they have no clearlythem do this, some firms are starting to take point
defined way of linking potential demand for ITsolutions such as portfolio management and helpdesk
services with available supply, because any suchand integrate them together themselves to try and
information is generally held in functional orobtain a consolidated view of the demand side of
project-based silos within the organization that arethings.
difficult to get at, let alone manage proactively. ButKey elements of IT include project and portfolio
there is a new embryonic market category that ismanagement, resource and asset management,
attempting to tackle just such thorny issues.performance and change management, business and
Although this nascent sector currently goes underIT service management and service delivery. While
many different names ranging from Forresterindividual tools to undertake such tasks exist today,
Research's Integrated IT Management to Ovum's ITthere is currently no one single vendor with all of the
governance, a particularly descriptive moniker haspieces of the jigsaw in place and none that are able
been proffered by AMR Research in the form of ITto feed all of the necessary information from the
resource planning (ITRP).different pieces into a single underlying database.
While there are no guarantees that this will becomeAs a result, vendors of all stripes are jumping into the
the industry's designation of choice, it is nonethelessmelee with varying degrees of success. Large players
evocative of what IT departments are trying tosuch as Compuware, IBM and Mercury Interactive, of
achieve.which AMR believes the latter to be the most
The idea behind ITRP as a product suite is to provideadvanced, have already amassed many of the
CIOs with enterprise resource planning (ERP)-likeelements and are starting work on integrating them.
applications to help them undertake such tasks asSuppliers such as Hewlett Packard, Computer
identifying relevant stakeholders, defining theirAssociates (CA), BMC Software and Peregrine have,
requirements and objectives, and establishing andto date, concentrated mainly on the supply side of
managing how much time, money and resources willthe equation, but are likely to flesh out the demand
be needed to fulfil them.management piece over time, perhaps by partnering
Yet another aim is to centralize informationwith different point product vendors or alternatively
emanating from key IT processes and procedures soby acquisition.
that IT departments can generate reports in businessThere is also a range of new start-ups starting to
language for executive managers, spelling out exactlymake their presence felt, however, the two highest
what they are delivering and the value they areprofile of which are ITM Software and Troux
providing.Technologies, while traditional ERP vendors such as
The core of IT governance is about knowing howSAP and some of the large systems integrators are
the IT architecture fits together, how to manage italso starting to sniff around, despite having failed to
and how to plan for change. If the business has aclarify their intentions to date.
requirement, how does it communicate that to theOn the bright side, the recognition that work needs
IT department? And how will that requirement affectto be done in this area has always been there and
the IT infrastructure, processes, resources andthe thinking around it is maturing.
assets because once you've understood how it playsIt's on people's radars from a strategic point of view,
in with the rest of your everyday or strategicbut for many, it's a very daunting prospect. You can
requirements, you can see the choices that you havestart at this from many angles, but it's about how to
going forward.join up the dots and because very few people have
People are really starting to focus on this becausea greenfield site, they have to look at how they can
they're trying to find ways to help the business bemigrate to something that will work in the future,
more efficient. It's all tied up with the aftermath ofwhile maintaining what they have.
an industry that overspent, didn't meet expectationsThe best approach is for IT directors to ask
and then went through bad times, which has left thethemselves what they're trying to do now and what
business jaded. In a way, IT is having to prove itselfthey're trying to achieve in the future and to match
and vendors and services providers are also trying tothat against the IT architecture, people and
find ways to make their offerings more saleable andprocesses that they already have in place.
bypass the cynicism.The next step is to undertake gap and risk analyses
But another issue that many IT organisations areand map the outcomes to the IT department's
finding is that they are unable to exploit newstrategic aims, before starting on small scale process
concepts and technologies such as service-orientedre-engineering and automation projects to fill the
architectures effectively because they simply don'tbiggest holes, whether that means resourcing,
have the right underlying foundations in place to doproject management or hitting service level
so.agreements.
Interest in ITRP has been sparked off by the factBut there may be downsides to going with the
that many enterprises have transformed the wayforthcoming end-to-end application suite approach
they operate to deal with an increasingly globalizedtoo. On the one hand, large suites are likely to be
market so it's now a matter of IT creating acomplex and lead to more complicated and longer
strategy to deliver against that.product selection cycles.
Companies have spent the last 10 years implementingOn the other hand, unless IT organizations and
systems such as ERP to try and deliver globalvendors are careful to use their existing knowledge
business processes and they're pretty far along theand expertise, there is always the danger that the
way. But this means that IT can't remain in a siloedlong implementation times, which gave ERP a bad
and fragmented form and has to transform itself toname a decade ago, could be repeated in a future
the new global way of doing business.ITRP world.