Mind The Gap Between Business Strategy & Operational Change

Anyone who’s been on London’sbecause I see how his ‘Systems Thinking’
Underground will have heard the world famousapproach will transform leadership within organisations.
warning for passengers. “Mind the Gap” wasHis discussion about the two halves of organisation
introduced in 1969 to warn passengers about thelife sees him refer to what he calls the rational half
space between the train carriage and the platform. and the non-rational half. The rational side holds all
Just like passengers in a hurry or who think theythose elements we fully expect to be associated
know best run the risk of falling between the two,with a business and its strategy: Strategic plans,
businesses need to maintain conscious awareness ofDirectives, Job Titles, Policies, Organisation Charts,
the very real and tangible gap existing between theiretc. These are if you like, tangible things you can
strategy and desire to achieve effective operationalphysically touch or at least see pinned up on a wall
change.somewhere; they are documents and diagrams that
Business Strategies are specific when it comes toare reference points along with targets that can be
the organisation's mission, vision and objectives;measured as time progresses. Then there’s the
Direction is clear, ROI specified, and growthnon-rational half, which is where I firmly believe much
expectations and market share targets listed tomore can be achieved at a much faster rate,
support both. Now the challenge starts. Thisparticularly during times of change. These non-rational
beautifully constructed well thought out strategyfactors form the heart of an organisation are where
must be turned into operational reality and if thethe gold nuggets are to be found: trust, friendship,
strategy is one that sees the business movingpower, culture, ambition, fears and insecurities, the
through previously uncharted waters, there will becorridor conversation and grapevine etc.
the inevitable changes along the way to operationalThese non-rational factors are more implicit and
practises.concern the “who” rather than the
In order to successfully translate the strategy,“how”. It’s these things that effective
disseminate it through to operations and minimise theleaders really understand and act upon. They are
pain experienced during times of change, leadership istuned-in to emotions, feelings, behaviours and
paramount. In his book “High Flyers –motivations in both themselves and those around
Developing the next generation of leaders”,them. They can answer the ‘what’s in it for
Morgan W. McCall, Jr talks about linking businessme’ question, which is just one of many
strategy and executive development. He suggests anemployees ask when they’re expected to buy-in
“organisations ability to achieve strategicto the strategy, work for the good of the company
objectives will depend in large part on the leadershipand achieve the objectives set to maximise the ROI
ability of executive leaders.” This makes perfectto ultimately make the shareholders or investors
sense but what makes an effective leader and howhappy.
can they reduce this very real gap?So here’s my call to action for you. Pull out that
Really good quality effective leaders are generallystrategy and take another look at it. Don’t just
recognised as those who have developed a highlook at the how, put effort into considering the who
degree of emotional intelligence.  William Tateand consider all the non-rational factors as it’s
references emotional intelligence in his book “Thethese that will play a far larger part in delivering a well
Search for Leadership – An Organisationaldefined strategy. Only once they are understood will
Perspective” when he discusses the two halvesyou have the solid foundation to be more effective
of organisation life.  I’ve referred to Williamin closing the gap.
Tate in previous posts and will continue to do so