The Role of Leadership in Sales and Operations Planning/Integrated Business Planning

Implemented properly, the Sales and Operationson the business issues and opportunities, looking
Planning (or Integrated Business Planning) process hasforward across the entire 24-month planning horizon
the potential to alter a company's operational andwhile keeping the best interest of the whole
financial performance drastically, helping executives tocompany in mind. It comes from the chief executive's
achieve goals and push strategies. Discover whatwell-articulated and frequently reinforced expectation
having a strong executive management team in placethat truth will drive the process, and misbehavior will
can do for S&OP initiatives at every level of thenot be tolerated. Examples of misbehaviors that are
business. What is the difference between a Sales anddestructive to the objectives of the S&OP/IBP
Operations Planning (S&OP) process that makes aprocess include disguising the truth (hedging and
modest difference in a company's operational and"sandbagging" that is not communicated, for
financial performance and an S&OP process that,example) and making decisions outside the S&OP
year after year, enables a company to achieve itsprocess without the leadership team's participation.
operational, business, and strategic goals?Trust and openness also become key organizational
You don't have to look beyond the senior leadershipvalues when performance measures focus on the
team for the answer.achievement of the strategy and performance
Sales and Operations Planning (also known asimprovement. If a functional group is penalized for
Integrated Business Planning) is an executivedoing what is best for the company, teamwork
management process for running the business. Thedissolves. This can occur, for example, when a
focus of S&OP in the 1980s and 1990s (and stillcommercial group's demand plan is reduced because
today for some companies) was a managementthere is insufficient capacity to fulfill demand, but the
process for aligning demand and supply at thecommercial group's revenue goal upon which
aggregate level.commissions are based is not likewise adjusted.
Today, Sales and Operations Planning has evolvedReducing the Chaos
into Integrated Business Planning where all companyWith strong leadership, team-based management
plans - product, demand, supply, strategic initiativesbecomes the unconscious way in which the business
and resulting financials - are synchronized and alignedis managed and operated. One client company
at the aggregate level each month. IBP has alsoachieved this breakthrough when, at the conclusion
evolved into a process for identifying gaps betweenof the management business review, one of the
future projections and the company's business andsenior leaders commented, "Do you realize this is the
strategic objectives - providing direction and makingfirst meeting where we weren't defending ourselves
decisions on how to most effectively close thoseand blaming each other, and we really focused on
gaps.making decisions for the business?"
With Integrated Business Planning, the seniorThe leader of another client company, which had
leadership team has a process where every monthbeen managing the business using Sales and
they understand not only performance to date, butOperations Planning for a little over one year, called
also the future state of the business over at least awith this report: He overheard a middle manager who
24-month, rolling, planning horizon. They also have awas new to the company ask: "Why do we do
process for ensuring that the appropriate actions andS&OP?" His compatriot answered: "I don't know for
activities are undertaken to achieve the company'ssure, but I don't want to go back to the way we
business and strategic objectives. The enterpriseused to do things. It was chaotic." An experienced
performance management element of Integratedpractitioner of S&OP made the point that "even if
Business Planning provides the platform for monitoringthe market place, our customers, and the external
execution of the company's operational and businessenvironment as a whole are chaotic, we don't have
strategies and goals.to have management chaos in our company. We
The above simply cannot happen without seniorhave chosen to manage the dynamics of the
leadership involvement in the process. Involvementbusiness using a regular and routine management
means just that - active, high-profile involvement, andapproach where we anticipate the changing dynamics
not just lip service support.in sufficient time to prevent needing to make last
The S&OP/IBP Processminute, costly responses."
Each step of the Sales and Operations PlanningAnother client company's leaders - from CEO, to
Integrated Business Planning process (productCOO, to the vice presidents of business units - state
management review, demand review, supply review,that Sales and Operations Planning has transformed
financial appraisal, and management business review)their business. Not only have they made several
has a senior leadership team owner, and ownershiptimely acquisitions, they have assimilated those
and involvement is not delegated. The managementacquisitions very well. Plus, during the recession, their
business review is the president/CEO/COO's meeting,financial performance has exceeded their competitors
and the participants are the senior leadership teamby quite a large margin.
representing product management, sales andThis statement of the impact that S&OP has had on
marketing, supply management, strategy and finance.the company is in sharp contrast to inquiries we get
Additionally, key functional support leaders of quality,from clients that struggle with S&OP. For those
human resources, public relations etc. are represented.struggling companies, usually, leadership involvement is
With the senior leadership team's active involvementlacking. Seeing S&OP as only a supply chain initiative,
in S&OP/IBP, the leadership culture changes. Insteadthese companies' leaders have set too low of an
of thinking in terms of what is best from a functionalambition for the process.
perspective, the leadership team provides directionIndependent research from firms like Aberdeen,
and makes decisions based on what is best for theVentana Research, and AMR Research have shown
company overall. What evolves is the developmentthat companies that do S&OP/IBP well are more
of common agendas and goals.successful than companies that do not. One finding
When Sales and Operations Planning/Integratedby Ventana Research showed that in companies that
Business Planning is first implemented, a leadershipreported the highest gains in customer satisfaction,
culture that emphasizes teamwork in working towardthe Sales and Operations Planning process was
common goals and agendas typically does not exist.sponsored by the CEO or CFO. This finding supports
That is because trust, openness, and honesty oftenthe authors' experience in leading and guiding
have not yet been established.companies to implement the Sales & Operations
With strong chief executive leadership in the S&OPPlanning/Integrated Business Planning process the
IBP process, trust will evolve. It comes from focusingright way.